Telechat Review of draft-ietf-6man-rfc2460bis-09
review-ietf-6man-rfc2460bis-09-secdir-telechat-orman-2017-04-13-00
Request | Review of | draft-ietf-6man-rfc2460bis |
---|---|---|
Requested revision | No specific revision (document currently at 13) | |
Type | Telechat Review | |
Team | Security Area Directorate (secdir) | |
Deadline | 2017-04-11 | |
Requested | 2017-03-17 | |
Authors | Dr. Steve E. Deering , Bob Hinden | |
I-D last updated | 2020-02-04 (Latest revision 2017-05-19) | |
Completed reviews |
Rtgdir IETF Last Call review of -08
by Papadimitriou Dimitri
(diff)
Intdir Early review of -08 by Bob Halley (diff) Genart IETF Last Call review of -08 by Peter E. Yee (diff) Tsvart Telechat review of -09 by Martin Stiemerling (diff) Secdir Telechat review of -09 by Hilarie Orman (diff) Opsdir Early review of -09 by Linda Dunbar (diff) |
|
Assignment | Reviewer | Hilarie Orman |
State | Completed | |
Request | Telechat review on draft-ietf-6man-rfc2460bis by Security Area Directorate Assigned | |
Reviewed revision | 09 (document currently at 13) | |
Result | Has issues | |
Completed | 2017-04-13 |
review-ietf-6man-rfc2460bis-09-secdir-telechat-orman-2017-04-13-00
Security review of Internet Protocol, Version 6 (IPv6) Specification draft-ietf-6man-rfc2460bis-09 Do not be alarmed. I have reviewed this document as part of the security directorate’s ongoing effort to review all IETF documents being processed by the IESG. These comments were written primarily for the benefit of the security area directors. Document editors and WG chairs should treat these comments just like any other last call comments. This document is the IPv6 specification. Recent modifications have clarified how to process extension headers. The security considerations are brief and have not changed: IPv6 ... has security properties similar to IPv4. Risks of corruption, forgery, and interception of packets, resulting in the exposure of private information, may be mitigated by use of the Security Architecture for the Internet Protocol [RFC4301] or encryption at higher layers of the protocol stack. I wonder if the only security consideration for IP is the risk of exposure of private information? Of course not. But, I suppose that's not in scope of this review. One thing worth mentioning about the changes re header processing is that is contributes to security by reducing complexity and reducing the attack surface. Hilarie