Last Call Review of draft-ietf-6man-rfc4291bis-07
review-ietf-6man-rfc4291bis-07-rtgdir-lc-drake-2017-02-28-00
Request | Review of | draft-ietf-6man-rfc4291bis |
---|---|---|
Requested revision | No specific revision (document currently at 09) | |
Type | Last Call Review | |
Team | Routing Area Directorate (rtgdir) | |
Deadline | 2017-03-01 | |
Requested | 2017-02-10 | |
Requested by | Alvaro Retana | |
Authors | Bob Hinden , Dr. Steve E. Deering | |
I-D last updated | 2017-02-28 | |
Completed reviews |
Intdir Early review of -06
by Brian Haberman
(diff)
Secdir Last Call review of -07 by Rich Salz (diff) Genart Last Call review of -07 by Robert Sparks (diff) Opsdir Last Call review of -07 by Menachem Dodge (diff) Rtgdir Last Call review of -07 by John Drake (diff) |
|
Assignment | Reviewer | John Drake |
State | Completed | |
Request | Last Call review on draft-ietf-6man-rfc4291bis by Routing Area Directorate Assigned | |
Reviewed revision | 07 (document currently at 09) | |
Result | Ready | |
Completed | 2017-02-28 |
review-ietf-6man-rfc4291bis-07-rtgdir-lc-drake-2017-02-28-00
Hello, I have been selected as the Routing Directorate reviewer for this draft. The Routing Directorate seeks to review all routing or routing-related drafts as they pass through IETF last call and IESG review, and sometimes on special request. The purpose of the review is to provide assistance to the Routing ADs. For more information about the Routing Directorate, please see http://trac.tools.ietf.org/area/rtg/trac/wiki/RtgDir Although these comments are primarily for the use of the Routing ADs, it would be helpful if you could consider them along with any other IETF Last Call comments that you receive, and strive to resolve them through discussion or by updating the draft. Document: draft-ietf-6man-rfc4291bis-07.txt Reviewer: John Drake Review Date: 28-Feb-2017 Intended Status: Standards Track Summary: No issues found. This document is ready for publication. Comments: The document was well structured, clear, and comprehensive Major Issues: No major issues found Minor Issues: No minor issues found Yours Irrespectively, John