Last Call Review of draft-ietf-6man-rfc6434-bis-08
review-ietf-6man-rfc6434-bis-08-rtgdir-lc-white-2018-06-25-00
| Request | Review of | draft-ietf-6man-rfc6434-bis |
|---|---|---|
| Requested revision | No specific revision (document currently at 09) | |
| Type | Last Call Review | |
| Team | Routing Area Directorate (rtgdir) | |
| Deadline | 2018-06-26 | |
| Requested | 2018-06-12 | |
| Requested by | Alvaro Retana | |
| Authors | Tim Chown , John A. Loughney , Timothy Winters | |
| I-D last updated | 2018-06-25 | |
| Completed reviews |
Opsdir Last Call review of -08
by Scott O. Bradner
(diff)
Rtgdir Last Call review of -08 by Russ White (diff) Genart Last Call review of -09 by Vijay K. Gurbani Secdir Last Call review of -09 by Tobias Gondrom Tsvart Telechat review of -08 by Magnus Westerlund (diff) |
|
| Assignment | Reviewer | Russ White |
| State | Completed | |
| Request | Last Call review on draft-ietf-6man-rfc6434-bis by Routing Area Directorate Assigned | |
| Reviewed revision | 08 (document currently at 09) | |
| Result | Ready | |
| Completed | 2018-06-25 |
review-ietf-6man-rfc6434-bis-08-rtgdir-lc-white-2018-06-25-00
Hello, I have been selected as the Routing Directorate reviewer for this draft. The Routing Directorate seeks to review all routing or routing-related drafts as they pass through IETF last call and IESG review, and sometimes on special request. The purpose of the review is to provide assistance to the Routing ADs. For more information about the Routing Directorate, please see http://trac.tools.ietf.org/area/rtg/trac/wiki/RtgDir Although these comments are primarily for the use of the Routing ADs, it would be helpful if you could consider them along with any other IETF Last Call comments that you receive, and strive to resolve them through discussion or by updating the draft. Document: draft-ietf-6man-rfc6434-bis Reviewer: Russ White Review Date: 25 June 2018 IETF LC End Date: ??? Intended Status: Best Common Practice Summary: No issues found. This document is ready for publication. This draft is readable and appears to be a useful update of the original document it is obsoleting. Major Issues: No major issues found. Minor Issues: No minor issues found.