Last Call Review of draft-ietf-6man-rfc6434-bis-09
review-ietf-6man-rfc6434-bis-09-secdir-lc-gondrom-2018-08-02-00

Request Review of draft-ietf-6man-rfc6434-bis
Requested revision No specific revision (document currently at 09)
Type Last Call Review
Team Security Area Directorate (secdir)
Deadline 2018-06-25
Requested 2018-06-11
Authors Tim Chown , John A. Loughney , Timothy Winters
I-D last updated 2018-08-02
Completed reviews Opsdir Last Call review of -08 by Scott O. Bradner (diff)
Rtgdir Last Call review of -08 by Russ White (diff)
Genart Last Call review of -09 by Vijay K. Gurbani
Secdir Last Call review of -09 by Tobias Gondrom
Tsvart Telechat review of -08 by Magnus Westerlund (diff)
Assignment Reviewer Tobias Gondrom
State Completed
Request Last Call review on draft-ietf-6man-rfc6434-bis by Security Area Directorate Assigned
Reviewed revision 09
Result Ready
Completed 2018-08-02
review-ietf-6man-rfc6434-bis-09-secdir-lc-gondrom-2018-08-02-00
Reviewer: Tobias Gondrom

Review result: Ok

 

I have reviewed this document as part of the security directorate's ongoing
effort to review all IETF documents being processed by the IESG.

These comments were written primarily for the benefit of the security area
directors.  Document editors and WG chairs should treat these comments just
like any other last call comments.

 

Overall the document is an update to RFC6434 and looks ok, ready to go. 

In my review, I did not find any material concerns with the document, and no
nits. 

The security considerations are nearly identical to RFC6434 with the added
paragraph in relation to IPv4 networking and reference to RFC7123, which is
ok. From the overall  new document text, it also is ok. 

 

Ready to release. 

 

Best regards, Tobias