Last Call Review of draft-ietf-6man-rfc6434-bis-09
review-ietf-6man-rfc6434-bis-09-secdir-lc-gondrom-2018-08-02-00
| Request | Review of | draft-ietf-6man-rfc6434-bis |
|---|---|---|
| Requested rev. | no specific revision (document currently at 09) | |
| Type | Last Call Review | |
| Team | Security Area Directorate (secdir) | |
| Deadline | 2018-06-25 | |
| Requested | 2018-06-11 | |
| Authors | Tim Chown, John Loughney, Timothy Winters | |
| Draft last updated | 2018-08-02 | |
| Completed reviews |
Opsdir Last Call review of -08 by Scott Bradner
(diff)
Rtgdir Last Call review of -08 by Russ White (diff) Genart Last Call review of -09 by Vijay Gurbani Secdir Last Call review of -09 by Tobias Gondrom Tsvart Telechat review of -08 by Magnus Westerlund (diff) |
|
| Assignment | Reviewer | Tobias Gondrom |
| State | Completed | |
| Review | review-ietf-6man-rfc6434-bis-09-secdir-lc-gondrom-2018-08-02 | |
| Reviewed rev. | 09 | |
| Review result | Ready | |
| Review completed: | 2018-08-02 |
Review
review-ietf-6man-rfc6434-bis-09-secdir-lc-gondrom-2018-08-02
Reviewer: Tobias Gondrom Review result: Ok I have reviewed this document as part of the security directorate's ongoing effort to review all IETF documents being processed by the IESG. These comments were written primarily for the benefit of the security area directors. Document editors and WG chairs should treat these comments just like any other last call comments. Overall the document is an update to RFC6434 and looks ok, ready to go. In my review, I did not find any material concerns with the document, and no nits. The security considerations are nearly identical to RFC6434 with the added paragraph in relation to IPv4 networking and reference to RFC7123, which is ok. From the overall new document text, it also is ok. Ready to release. Best regards, Tobias