IETF Last Call Review of draft-ietf-6man-rfc6724-update-19
review-ietf-6man-rfc6724-update-19-opsdir-lc-comstedt-2025-04-20-00

Request Review of draft-ietf-6man-rfc6724-update
Requested revision No specific revision (document currently at 25)
Type IETF Last Call Review
Team Ops Directorate (opsdir)
Deadline 2025-04-02
Requested 2025-03-12
Requested by Mohamed Boucadair
Authors Nick Buraglio , Tim Chown , Jeremy Duncan
I-D last updated 2026-07-06 (Latest revision 2025-08-11)
Completed reviews Tsvart IETF Last Call review of -18 by Michael Tüxen (diff)
Dnsdir IETF Last Call review of -18 by Vladimír Čunát (diff)
Opsdir IETF Last Call review of -19 by Niclas Comstedt (diff)
Genart IETF Last Call review of -18 by Elwyn B. Davies (diff)
Secdir IETF Last Call review of -18 by Ned Smith (diff)
Dnsdir Telechat review of -20 by Jim Reid (diff)
Intdir Telechat review of -23 by Timothy Winters (diff)
Dnsdir Telechat review of -21 by Jim Reid (diff)
Dnsdir Telechat review of -22 by Jim Reid (diff)
Assignment Reviewer Niclas Comstedt
State Completed
Request IETF Last Call review on draft-ietf-6man-rfc6724-update by Ops Directorate Assigned
Posted at https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ops-dir/htj5MU0lNaRfYbZZLcf2_KSJcoU
Reviewed revision 19 (document currently at 25)
Result Ready
Completed 2025-04-20
review-ietf-6man-rfc6724-update-19-opsdir-lc-comstedt-2025-04-20-00
Hi

I have reviewed this document as part of the Operational directorate's ongoing
effort to review all IETF documents being processed by the IESG. Document
editors and WG chairs should treat these comments just like any other last call
comments.

I'm not an expert on some of the details in here nor up to date with how common 
some scenarios are now days vs. others. But I have no operational concerns with
the doc, it's well written, clear and it makes sense to me. Some of the earlier
mentioned suggestions and nits by others has also been addressed in this version. 

Regards,
   Niclas