Last Call Review of draft-ietf-6man-segment-routing-header-22
review-ietf-6man-segment-routing-header-22-opsdir-lc-liu-2019-08-14-00
| Request | Review of | draft-ietf-6man-segment-routing-header |
|---|---|---|
| Requested revision | No specific revision (document currently at 26) | |
| Type | Last Call Review | |
| Team | Ops Directorate (opsdir) | |
| Deadline | 2019-08-20 | |
| Requested | 2019-08-06 | |
| Authors | Clarence Filsfils , Darren Dukes , Stefano Previdi , John Leddy , Satoru Matsushima , Daniel Voyer | |
| I-D last updated | 2019-08-14 | |
| Completed reviews |
Secdir Last Call review of -22
by Liang Xia
(diff)
Genart Last Call review of -22 by Roni Even (diff) Tsvart Last Call review of -22 by Dr. Joseph D. Touch (diff) Opsdir Last Call review of -22 by Will (Shucheng) LIU (diff) |
|
| Assignment | Reviewer | Will (Shucheng) LIU |
| State | Completed | |
| Request | Last Call review on draft-ietf-6man-segment-routing-header by Ops Directorate Assigned | |
| Posted at | https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ops-dir/HeW7QukuYKe1ivlW0DoXMaZdgms | |
| Reviewed revision | 22 (document currently at 26) | |
| Result | Ready | |
| Completed | 2019-08-14 |
review-ietf-6man-segment-routing-header-22-opsdir-lc-liu-2019-08-14-00
Hi all, I have reviewed draft-ietf-6man-segment-routing-header-22 as part of the Operational directorate's ongoing effort to review all IETF documents being processed by the IESG. These comments were written with the intent of improving the operational aspects of the IETF drafts. Comments that are not addressed in last call may be included in AD reviews during the IESG review. Document editors and WG chairs should treat these comments just like any other last call comments. “Segment Routing can be applied to the IPv6 data plane using a new type of Routing Extension Header called the Segment Routing Header. This document describes the Segment Routing Header and how it is used by Segment Routing capable nodes.” My overall view of the document is 'Ready' for publication. ** Technical ** No. ** Editorial ** As noted by author, section 9 Implementation Status is to be moved removed prior to publishing as an RFC. However, it may be still valuable to simplify this part and put into appendix as a record. Regards, Will (Shucheng LIU)