IETF Last Call Review of draft-ietf-6man-sidlist-clarification-02
review-ietf-6man-sidlist-clarification-02-rtgdir-lc-qu-2026-05-01-00
| Request | Review of | draft-ietf-6man-sidlist-clarification |
|---|---|---|
| Requested revision | No specific revision (document currently at 02) | |
| Type | IETF Last Call Review | |
| Team | Routing Area Directorate (rtgdir) | |
| Deadline | 2026-04-24 | |
| Requested | 2026-04-10 | |
| Requested by | Éric Vyncke | |
| Authors | Adrian Farrel , Suresh Krishnan | |
| I-D last updated | 2026-04-24 (Latest revision 2026-04-24) | |
| Completed reviews |
Rtgdir IETF Last Call review of -02
by Yingzhen Qu
Genart IETF Last Call review of -01 by Russ Housley (diff) Secdir IETF Last Call review of -02 by Peter E. Yee |
|
| Assignment | Reviewer | Yingzhen Qu |
| State | Completed | |
| Request | IETF Last Call review on draft-ietf-6man-sidlist-clarification by Routing Area Directorate Assigned | |
| Posted at | https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rtg-dir/PA9mJt_sEF9hxPTUbLFd-zhxzdo | |
| Reviewed revision | 02 | |
| Result | Ready | |
| Completed | 2026-05-01 |
review-ietf-6man-sidlist-clarification-02-rtgdir-lc-qu-2026-05-01-00
Document: draft-ietf-6man-sidlist-clarification Reviewer: Yingzhen Qu Review Date: 2026-05-01 IETF LC End Date: 2026-04-24 Intended Status: Standards ## Summary Thanks to the authors for working on the document, it is nicely written and clear. There are a few nits for the authors to consider. ## nits 81 use of the Segment Routing Header (SRH) [RFC8754] an IPv6 extension should be "use of the Segment Routing Header (SRH) [RFC8754], an IPv6 extension" 162 List are 128 bit entries, but not necessarily IPv6 addresses. s/128 bit/128-bit 204 List are 128 bit entries, but not necessarily IPv6 addresses. same as above.