Telechat Review of draft-ietf-6man-vpn-dest-opt-04
review-ietf-6man-vpn-dest-opt-04-opsdir-telechat-hares-2025-04-04-00

Request Review of draft-ietf-6man-vpn-dest-opt
Requested revision No specific revision (document currently at 05)
Type Telechat Review
Team Ops Directorate (opsdir)
Deadline 2025-03-28
Requested 2025-03-09
Requested by Mohamed Boucadair
Authors Ron Bonica , Xing Li , Adrian Farrel , Yuji Kamite , Luay Jalil
I-D last updated 2025-04-17 (Latest revision 2025-04-05)
Completed reviews Genart IETF Last Call review of -01 by Linda Dunbar (diff)
Secdir IETF Last Call review of -01 by Peter E. Yee (diff)
Genart Telechat review of -04 by Linda Dunbar (diff)
Intdir Telechat review of -04 by Antoine Fressancourt (diff)
Opsdir Telechat review of -04 by Susan Hares (diff)
Comments 
Please focus on ops implications, clarity/lack/need of deployment/deployability matters, and management considerations. Thank you.
Assignment Reviewer Susan Hares
State Completed
Request Telechat review on draft-ietf-6man-vpn-dest-opt by Ops Directorate Assigned
Posted at https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ops-dir/F7iMjOQrs1KeownQf6ojEO0XNvc
Reviewed revision 04 (document currently at 05)
Result Has issues
Completed 2025-04-04
review-ietf-6man-vpn-dest-opt-04-opsdir-telechat-hares-2025-04-04-00
This is an OPS-DIR review for management issues.

The Standardized VPN technologies do not include SR routing and the SRv6 header
changes. Why are these not considered?

If they are not to be considered, perhaps the authors should add this to the
list of things ignored in the experiment.

It seems odd since the authors clearly have expertise to add this into the
draft.