Skip to main content

Last Call Review of draft-ietf-ace-wg-coap-eap-09

Request Review of draft-ietf-ace-wg-coap-eap
Requested revision No specific revision (document currently at 10)
Type Last Call Review
Team General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) (genart)
Deadline 2024-01-25
Requested 2024-01-11
Authors Rafael Marin-Lopez , Dan Garcia-Carrillo
I-D last updated 2024-01-24
Completed reviews Secdir Last Call review of -09 by Deb Cooley (diff)
Genart Last Call review of -09 by Roni Even (diff)
Secdir Early review of -08 by Deb Cooley (diff)
Iotdir Early review of -08 by Eliot Lear (diff)
Assignment Reviewer Roni Even
State Completed
Request Last Call review on draft-ietf-ace-wg-coap-eap by General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) Assigned
Posted at
Reviewed revision 09 (document currently at 10)
Result Ready w/nits
Completed 2024-01-24
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area
Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed
by the IESG for the IETF Chair.  Please treat these comments just
like any other last call comments.

For more information, please see the FAQ at


Document: draft-ietf-ace-wg-coap-eap-??
Reviewer: Roni Even
Review Date: 2024-01-24
IETF LC End Date: 2024-01-25
IESG Telechat date: Not scheduled for a telechat

The document is ready for publication as a standard track rfc with nits

Major issues:

Minor issues:

Nits/editorial comments:
The document defines a well known uri. Through out the document it keeps the
name well-known but it should be replaced with the specified coap-eap by the
authors or as a directive to the rfc editor. As for the iana registration
request rfc8615 registration procedure is specification required and not expert
review. There is also a missing column “state” probably should be permanent.