Last Call Review of draft-ietf-acme-ip-06
review-ietf-acme-ip-06-genart-lc-sparks-2019-06-03-00
| Request | Review of | draft-ietf-acme-ip |
|---|---|---|
| Requested revision | No specific revision (document currently at 08) | |
| Type | Last Call Review | |
| Team | General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) (genart) | |
| Deadline | 2019-06-12 | |
| Requested | 2019-05-29 | |
| Authors | Roland Bracewell Shoemaker | |
| I-D last updated | 2019-06-03 | |
| Completed reviews |
Secdir Last Call review of -06
by Dan Harkins
(diff)
Opsdir Last Call review of -06 by Joel Jaeggli (diff) Genart Last Call review of -06 by Robert Sparks (diff) Opsdir Last Call review of -06 by Tim Chown (diff) |
|
| Assignment | Reviewer | Robert Sparks |
| State | Completed | |
| Request | Last Call review on draft-ietf-acme-ip by General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) Assigned | |
| Posted at | https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/gen-art/Hu8CIjCIMvnq6jpP1wI5TQDO65k | |
| Reviewed revision | 06 (document currently at 08) | |
| Result | Ready | |
| Completed | 2019-06-03 |
review-ietf-acme-ip-06-genart-lc-sparks-2019-06-03-00
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please treat these comments just like any other last call comments. For more information, please see the FAQ at <https://trac.ietf.org/trac/gen/wiki/GenArtfaq>. Document: draft-ietf-acme-ip-06 Reviewer: Robert Sparks Review Date: 2019-06-03 IETF LC End Date: 2019-06-12 IESG Telechat date: Not scheduled for a telechat Summary: Ready for publication as a proposed standard rfc. One minor nit: The security considerations section reads oddly. I'm not sure what it means for an extension to deviate from a threat model. I think you want to say "does not add to" rather than "does not deviate"?