Last Call Review of draft-ietf-acme-ip-06
review-ietf-acme-ip-06-secdir-lc-harkins-2019-06-06-00

Request Review of draft-ietf-acme-ip
Requested revision No specific revision (document currently at 08)
Type IETF Last Call Review
Team Security Area Directorate (secdir)
Deadline 2019-06-13
Requested 2019-05-29
Requested by Roman Danyliw
Authors Roland Bracewell Shoemaker
I-D last updated 2020-02-29 (Latest revision 2019-10-01)
Completed reviews Secdir IETF Last Call review of -06 by Dan Harkins (diff)
Opsdir IETF Last Call review of -06 by Joel Jaeggli (diff)
Genart IETF Last Call review of -06 by Robert Sparks (diff)
Opsdir IETF Last Call review of -06 by Tim Chown (diff)
Assignment Reviewer Dan Harkins
State Completed
Request IETF Last Call review on draft-ietf-acme-ip by Security Area Directorate Assigned
Posted at https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/secdir/PnrgLQpqQCFEaeUHR49QOa8E8LE
Reviewed revision 06 (document currently at 08)
Result Ready
Completed 2019-06-06
review-ietf-acme-ip-06-secdir-lc-harkins-2019-06-06-00
   Greetings,

   I have reviewed this document as part of the security directorate's
ongoing effort to review all IETF documents being processed by the
IESG.  These comments were written primarily for the benefit of the
security area directors.  Document editors and WG chairs should treat
these comments just like any other last call comments.

   The summary of the review is READY.

   This draft adds two new ACME Validation Methods to allow for validation
of IPv4 and IPv6 addresses in X.509 certificates. It is short, simple,
and to the point. The Security Considerations are minimal (basically "see
this other RFC") but given what is being added seem entirely fine.

   regards,

   Dan.