Last Call Review of draft-ietf-add-svcb-dns-06
review-ietf-add-svcb-dns-06-intdir-lc-bernardos-2022-07-07-00

Request Review of draft-ietf-add-svcb-dns
Requested revision No specific revision (document currently at 09)
Type Last Call Review
Team Internet Area Directorate (intdir)
Deadline 2022-07-08
Requested 2022-06-24
Requested by Éric Vyncke
Authors Benjamin M. Schwartz
I-D last updated 2022-07-07
Completed reviews Intdir Last Call review of -06 by Carlos J. Bernardos (diff)
Artart Last Call review of -06 by Martin J. Dürst (diff)
Genart Last Call review of -06 by Peter E. Yee (diff)
Secdir Last Call review of -06 by Joseph A. Salowey (diff)
Dnsdir Last Call review of -08 by Scott Rose (diff)
Assignment Reviewer Carlos J. Bernardos
State Completed
Request Last Call review on draft-ietf-add-svcb-dns by Internet Area Directorate Assigned
Posted at https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/int-dir/6EJ8Pu-plTNk7klq3QKj5RokN0Q
Reviewed revision 06 (document currently at 09)
Result Ready w/nits
Completed 2022-07-07
review-ietf-add-svcb-dns-06-intdir-lc-bernardos-2022-07-07-00
I am an assigned INT directorate reviewer for draft-ietf-add-svcb-dns. These
comments were written primarily for the benefit of the Internet Area Directors.
Document editors and shepherd(s) should treat these comments just like they
would treat comments from any other IETF contributors and resolve them along
with any other Last Call comments that have been received. For more details on
the INT Directorate, see https://datatracker.ietf.org/group/intdir/about/
<https://datatracker.ietf.org/group/intdir/about/>.

Based on my review, the document is ready. I’m not an expert on SVCB, and I had
to browse to the main SVCB document while doing the review.

I have not found any major issue. The following are minor issues (typos,
misspelling, minor text improvements) with the document:

- Nit:

OLD TEXT:
   When the binding authority specifies a non-default port number, Port-
   Prefix Naming places the port number in an additional a prefix on the
   name.

NEW TEXT:
   When the binding authority specifies a non-default port number, Port-
   Prefix Naming places the port number in an additional prefix on the
   name.

Thanks,

Carlos