Skip to main content

Last Call Review of draft-ietf-alto-cost-mode-03

Request Review of draft-ietf-alto-cost-mode
Requested revision No specific revision (document currently at 05)
Type Last Call Review
Team Security Area Directorate (secdir)
Deadline 2022-05-13
Requested 2022-04-29
Authors Mohamed Boucadair , Qin Wu
I-D last updated 2022-05-19
Completed reviews Genart Last Call review of -02 by Roni Even (diff)
Artart Last Call review of -02 by Jaime Jimenez (diff)
Secdir Last Call review of -03 by Stephen Farrell (diff)
Assignment Reviewer Stephen Farrell
State Completed
Request Last Call review on draft-ietf-alto-cost-mode by Security Area Directorate Assigned
Posted at
Reviewed revision 03 (document currently at 05)
Result Ready
Completed 2022-05-19
This document seems ready to me.

I did have one question - RFC7285 says that servers MUST support one of the
numeric or ordinal cost-modes. It wasn't entirely clear to me whether it's
intended that that remain the case, but I assume it is, so that e.g. it'd be
invalid to have a server that only supports some new "foo" cost mode. If that's
the case, then this draft is fine. If something else was intended then I guess
a bit more text on that would be needed.