Last Call Review of draft-ietf-alto-deployments-15
review-ietf-alto-deployments-15-genart-lc-carpenter-2016-06-17-00

Request Review of draft-ietf-alto-deployments
Requested revision No specific revision (document currently at 16)
Type Last Call Review
Team General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) (genart)
Deadline 2016-06-21
Requested 2016-06-08
Authors Martin Stiemerling , Sebastian Kiesel , Michael Scharf , Hans Seidel , Stefano Previdi
I-D last updated 2016-06-17
Completed reviews Genart Last Call review of -15 by Brian E. Carpenter (diff)
Genart Telechat review of -15 by Brian E. Carpenter (diff)
Opsdir Last Call review of -14 by Carlos Pignataro (diff)
Secdir Last Call review of -15 by Klaas Wierenga (diff)
Assignment Reviewer Brian E. Carpenter
State Completed
Request Last Call review on draft-ietf-alto-deployments by General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) Assigned
Reviewed revision 15 (document currently at 16)
Result Ready
Completed 2016-06-17
review-ietf-alto-deployments-15-genart-lc-carpenter-2016-06-17-00
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area
Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed
by the IESG for the IETF Chair.  Please treat these comments just
like any other last call comments.

For more information, please see the FAQ at
<

http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq>.

Document: draft-ietf-alto-deployments-15.txt
Reviewer: Brian Carpenter
Review Date: 2016-06-13
IETF LC End Date: 2016-06-21
IESG Telechat date: 2016-06-30

Summary: Ready
--------

Comment:
--------

This is a long document but well written, so there is little to say about it.

Minor issues:
-------------

The Conclusion section could be deleted. It doesn't add anything.

There are a lot of Informational references that are still personal I-Ds. Many of
them are not even listed as "Related Internet-Drafts" for the Alto WG. I think readers
of the future RFC will find this a bit annoying.