Telechat Review of draft-ietf-alto-deployments-15
review-ietf-alto-deployments-15-genart-telechat-carpenter-2016-06-24-00
Request | Review of | draft-ietf-alto-deployments |
---|---|---|
Requested revision | No specific revision (document currently at 16) | |
Type | Telechat Review | |
Team | General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) (genart) | |
Deadline | 2016-06-28 | |
Requested | 2016-06-22 | |
Authors | Martin Stiemerling , Sebastian Kiesel , Michael Scharf , Hans Seidel , Stefano Previdi | |
I-D last updated | 2016-06-24 | |
Completed reviews |
Genart Last Call review of -15
by Brian E. Carpenter
(diff)
Genart Telechat review of -15 by Brian E. Carpenter (diff) Opsdir Last Call review of -14 by Carlos Pignataro (diff) Secdir Last Call review of -15 by Klaas Wierenga (diff) |
|
Assignment | Reviewer | Brian E. Carpenter |
State | Completed | |
Request | Telechat review on draft-ietf-alto-deployments by General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) Assigned | |
Reviewed revision | 15 (document currently at 16) | |
Result | Ready | |
Completed | 2016-06-24 |
review-ietf-alto-deployments-15-genart-telechat-carpenter-2016-06-24-00
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please wait for direction from your document shepherd or AD before posting a new version of the draft. For more information, please see the FAQ at < http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq>. Document: draft-ietf-alto-deployments-15.txt Reviewer: Brian Carpenter Review Date: 2016-06-13 IETF LC End Date: 2016-06-21 IESG Telechat date: 2016-06-30 Summary: Ready -------- Comment: -------- This is a long document but well written, so there is little to say about it. Minor issues: ------------- The Conclusion section could be deleted. It doesn't add anything. There are a lot of Informational references that are still personal I-Ds. Many of them are not even listed as "Related Internet-Drafts" for the Alto WG. I think readers of the future RFC will find this a bit annoying. Nits: ----- <jan.seedorf at neclab.eu> and <martin.stiemerling at neclab.eu> bounced