Last Call Review of draft-ietf-alto-performance-metrics-16
review-ietf-alto-performance-metrics-16-secdir-lc-roca-2021-07-21-00

Request Review of draft-ietf-alto-performance-metrics
Requested revision No specific revision (document currently at 28)
Type Last Call Review
Team Security Area Directorate (secdir)
Deadline 2021-08-02
Requested 2021-07-12
Authors Qin Wu , Y. Richard Yang , Young Lee , Dhruv Dhody , Sabine Randriamasy , Luis M. Contreras
I-D last updated 2021-07-21
Completed reviews Tsvart Early review of -03 by Brian Trammell (diff)
Secdir Last Call review of -16 by Vincent Roca (diff)
Artart Last Call review of -17 by Christian Amsüss (diff)
Assignment Reviewer Vincent Roca
State Completed
Request Last Call review on draft-ietf-alto-performance-metrics by Security Area Directorate Assigned
Posted at https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/secdir/SRI19_SHBQLicNZJ_wuiKxaHcKg
Reviewed revision 16 (document currently at 28)
Result Ready
Completed 2021-07-21
review-ietf-alto-performance-metrics-16-secdir-lc-roca-2021-07-21-00
Hello,

I have reviewed this document as part of the security directorate's
ongoing effort to review all IETF documents being processed by the
IESG.  These comments were written primarily for the benefit of the
security area directors. Document editors and WG chairs should treat
these comments just like any other last call comments.

The "Security considerations" section extensively refers to RFC 7285
which makes sense. I have no comment.

I consider this document as "READY" from the secdir point of view.

Minor comment: the "TE" acronym is used without being defined 
(it is only the case in references)

Regards,     Vincent