Last Call Review of draft-ietf-alto-performance-metrics-16
review-ietf-alto-performance-metrics-16-secdir-lc-roca-2021-07-21-00
| Request | Review of | draft-ietf-alto-performance-metrics |
|---|---|---|
| Requested revision | No specific revision (document currently at 28) | |
| Type | Last Call Review | |
| Team | Security Area Directorate (secdir) | |
| Deadline | 2021-08-02 | |
| Requested | 2021-07-12 | |
| Authors | Qin Wu , Y. Richard Yang , Young Lee , Dhruv Dhody , Sabine Randriamasy , Luis M. Contreras | |
| Draft last updated | 2021-07-21 | |
| Completed reviews |
Tsvart Early review of -03
by
Brian Trammell
(diff)
Secdir Last Call review of -16 by Vincent Roca (diff) Artart Last Call review of -17 by Christian Amsüss (diff) |
|
| Assignment | Reviewer | Vincent Roca |
| State | Completed | |
| Review |
review-ietf-alto-performance-metrics-16-secdir-lc-roca-2021-07-21
|
|
| Posted at | https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/secdir/SRI19_SHBQLicNZJ_wuiKxaHcKg | |
| Reviewed revision | 16 (document currently at 28) | |
| Result | Ready | |
| Completed | 2021-07-21 |
review-ietf-alto-performance-metrics-16-secdir-lc-roca-2021-07-21-00
Hello, I have reviewed this document as part of the security directorate's ongoing effort to review all IETF documents being processed by the IESG. These comments were written primarily for the benefit of the security area directors. Document editors and WG chairs should treat these comments just like any other last call comments. The "Security considerations" section extensively refers to RFC 7285 which makes sense. I have no comment. I consider this document as "READY" from the secdir point of view. Minor comment: the "TE" acronym is used without being defined (it is only the case in references) Regards, Vincent