Skip to main content

Last Call Review of draft-ietf-anima-asa-guidelines-04
review-ietf-anima-asa-guidelines-04-opsdir-lc-dodge-2021-12-13-00

Request Review of draft-ietf-anima-asa-guidelines
Requested revision No specific revision (document currently at 07)
Type Last Call Review
Team Ops Directorate (opsdir)
Deadline 2021-12-13
Requested 2021-11-29
Authors Brian E. Carpenter , Laurent Ciavaglia , Sheng Jiang , Peloso Pierre
I-D last updated 2021-12-13
Completed reviews Artart Last Call review of -04 by Martin J. Dürst (diff)
Opsdir Last Call review of -04 by Menachem Dodge (diff)
Genart Last Call review of -04 by Thomas Fossati (diff)
Intdir Telechat review of -05 by Benno Overeinder (diff)
Assignment Reviewer Menachem Dodge
State Completed
Request Last Call review on draft-ietf-anima-asa-guidelines by Ops Directorate Assigned
Posted at https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ops-dir/yhZjY62JjPNkZ63EvNcB4SFdJUY
Reviewed revision 04 (document currently at 07)
Result Ready
Completed 2021-12-13
review-ietf-anima-asa-guidelines-04-opsdir-lc-dodge-2021-12-13-00
 I have reviewed this document as part of the Operational directorate's ongoing
effort to review all IETF documents being processed by the IESG.  These
comments were written with the intent of improving the operational aspects of
the IETF drafts. Comments that are not addressed in last call may be included
in AD reviews during the IESG review.  Document editors and WG chairs should
treat these comments just like any other last call comments.

The document is intended as an informational document and proposes guidelines
for the design of Autonomic Service Agents for autonomic networks. The document
refers to a number of other documents such as RFC 8990, RFC 8993 and RFC 8994.
Unfortunately, I did not have to time to read these additional documents.

The document is written well and is very readable. It seems to be very thorough
and well structured. I believe that a diagram would be beneficial in the
introduction section to help the understanding of the reader.

There is a note at the beginning of section 6.3 which I was not sure if it is
intended to remain in the published document: "Note: This section is to be
further developed in future revisions of the document, especially the
implications on the design of ASAs."

Section 11 "Security Considerations" section has been well written.

Other than that I have no further issues with the document.