Last Call Review of draft-ietf-anima-brski-prm-15
review-ietf-anima-brski-prm-15-opsdir-lc-chen-2025-01-07-00

Request Review of draft-ietf-anima-brski-prm
Requested revision No specific revision (document currently at 18)
Type Last Call Review
Team Ops Directorate (opsdir)
Deadline 2024-12-06
Requested 2024-11-19
Requested by Mahesh Jethanandani
Authors Steffen Fries , Thomas Werner , Eliot Lear , Michael Richardson
I-D last updated 2025-01-07
Completed reviews Secdir Early review of -10 by Charlie Kaufman (diff)
Secdir Early review of -05 by Charlie Kaufman (diff)
Yangdoctors Early review of -05 by Martin Björklund (diff)
Iotdir Early review of -05 by Marco Tiloca (diff)
Iotdir Last Call review of -15 by Marco Tiloca (diff)
Secdir Last Call review of -17 by Wes Hardaker (diff)
Opsdir Last Call review of -15 by Ran Chen (diff)
Dnsdir Last Call review of -17 by David C Lawrence (diff)
Genart Last Call review of -17 by Paul Kyzivat (diff)
Comments 
The shepherd writeup suggested that a security area and IoT directorate review be conducted once the document is ready for publication.
Assignment Reviewer Ran Chen
State Completed
Request Last Call review on draft-ietf-anima-brski-prm by Ops Directorate Assigned
Posted at https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ops-dir/fGsezgNYm0XJmfL_RDSAxRi4kGo
Reviewed revision 15 (document currently at 18)
Result Has nits
Completed 2025-01-07
review-ietf-anima-brski-prm-15-opsdir-lc-chen-2025-01-07-00
This document extends the original BRSKI (Bootstrapping Remote Secure Key
Infrastructure) protocol by introducing a new operational mode—Pledge in
Responder Mode (PRM). This extension is particularly useful in constrained or
dynamic network environments where the traditional initiator-based workflow of
BRSKI may not be feasible. It would be better to have a separate section for
operational consideration.

## Minor
For Normative References:
I-D.ietf-netconf-sztp-csr updated to RFC9646.
Please pay more attention to I-D. draft-ietf-anima-rfc8366bis, which is still
in WG draft status.

Section 6.2.1
The term described in rfc8995 is Slowloris-like attack, not Slowloris attack.
It is recommended to change it to Slowloris-like attack.

## NITS:
- s/ an Registrar Voucher-Request (RVR) / a Registrar Voucher-Request (RVR)/
- s/was signed signed / was signed/
- s/The plege / The pledge /
- s/ EE certficate / EE certificate /
- s/ BRSKI .well-known/ BRSKI well-known/
Thanks for your contribution!
Best Regards,
Ran Chen