Last Call Review of draft-ietf-anima-reference-model-06
review-ietf-anima-reference-model-06-opsdir-lc-zhou-2018-08-19-00
Request | Review of | draft-ietf-anima-reference-model |
---|---|---|
Requested revision | No specific revision (document currently at 10) | |
Type | Last Call Review | |
Team | Ops Directorate (opsdir) | |
Deadline | 2018-08-21 | |
Requested | 2018-08-07 | |
Authors | Michael H. Behringer , Brian E. Carpenter , Toerless Eckert , Laurent Ciavaglia , Jéferson Campos Nobre | |
I-D last updated | 2018-08-19 | |
Completed reviews |
Rtgdir Telechat review of -07
by Christian Hopps
(diff)
Opsdir Last Call review of -06 by Tianran Zhou (diff) Genart Last Call review of -06 by Joel M. Halpern (diff) Secdir Last Call review of -06 by Radia Perlman (diff) Genart Telechat review of -08 by Joel M. Halpern (diff) |
|
Assignment | Reviewer | Tianran Zhou |
State | Completed | |
Request | Last Call review on draft-ietf-anima-reference-model by Ops Directorate Assigned | |
Reviewed revision | 06 (document currently at 10) | |
Result | Ready | |
Completed | 2018-08-19 |
review-ietf-anima-reference-model-06-opsdir-lc-zhou-2018-08-19-00
I have reviewed this document as part of the Operational directorate's ongoing effort to review all IETF documents being processed by the IESG. These comments were written with the intent of improving the operational aspects of the IETF drafts. Comments that are not addressed in last call may be included in AD reviews during the IESG review. Document editors and WG chairs should treat these comments just like any other last call comments. I did not see any special operational or network management related issue. This document is clear to me and is ready for publication. By the way, do you think "MRACL" in this document need a reference or expansion? Cheers, Tianran