Skip to main content

IETF Last Call Review of draft-ietf-anima-rfc8366bis-30
review-ietf-anima-rfc8366bis-30-genart-lc-sarikaya-2026-05-08-00

Request Review of draft-ietf-anima-rfc8366bis
Requested revision No specific revision (document currently at 31)
Type IETF Last Call Review
Team General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) (genart)
Deadline 2026-05-03
Requested 2026-05-03
Authors Kent Watsen , Michael Richardson , Esko Dijk , Toerless Eckert , Qiufang Ma
I-D last updated 2026-06-04 (Latest revision 2026-05-14)
Completed reviews Opsdir Early review of -29 by Tim Wicinski (diff)
Yangdoctors Early review of -29 by Michal Vaško (diff)
Iotdir Early review of -29 by Thomas Fossati (diff)
Genart IETF Last Call review of -30 by Behcet Sarikaya (diff)
Dnsdir IETF Last Call review of -31 by Geoff Huston
Assignment Reviewer Behcet Sarikaya
State Completed
Request IETF Last Call review on draft-ietf-anima-rfc8366bis by General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) Assigned
Posted at https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/gen-art/y4CxZuGBXMLhxfaLKdCmPKCf6-o
Reviewed revision 30 (document currently at 31)
Result Ready w/nits
Completed 2026-05-08
review-ietf-anima-rfc8366bis-30-genart-lc-sarikaya-2026-05-08-00
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area
Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed
by the IESG for the IETF Chair.  Please treat these comments just
like any other last call comments.

For more information, please see the FAQ at

<https://wiki.ietf.org/en/group/gen/GenArtFAQ>.

Document: draft-ietf-anima-rfc8366bis-??
Reviewer: Behcet Sarikaya
Review Date: 2026-05-08
IETF LC End Date: None
IESG Telechat date: Not scheduled for a telechat

Summary:

This document presents an updated Bootstrapping Remote Secure Key
Infrastructures (BRSKI) which defines a bootstrapping solution that enables
devices to securely join the device owner's network domain using
manufacturer-installed IEEE 802.1AR certificates, together with a
manufacturer-provided Internet service called the Manufacturer Authorized
Signing Authority (MASA).

Major issues:

Minor issues:

Nits/editorial comments:

Sec. 1
 This document does not follow that pattern, but future
   documents may update only the YANG module.
->  This document does not follow that pattern, so future
   documents may update only the YANG module.

a new IETF standard mechanism for extensions modeled after the
   mechanism **presented** in [RFC8520]

Sec. 5.1
Constrained IoT devices is an important issue in IoT.
The document is missing a reference to RFC7228-bis which will become an RFC
soon.

Sec. 8

 inappropriate/informal writing:
During development of this merged YANG module, **advice was given**  to
   better organize mutually exclusive Attributes

Section 8.3 YANG module is given and there is an Yang doctor review.

Sec. 9.2 RFC XXXX refer to itself as in all documents that contain YANG modules
it could be changed to "this document"

Acknowledgements contain one author name (the first author)