Last Call Review of draft-ietf-appsawg-json-merge-patch-06
review-ietf-appsawg-json-merge-patch-06-opsdir-lc-wijnen-2014-08-05-00
Request | Review of | draft-ietf-appsawg-json-merge-patch |
---|---|---|
Requested revision | No specific revision (document currently at 07) | |
Type | Last Call Review | |
Team | Ops Directorate (opsdir) | |
Deadline | 2014-08-08 | |
Requested | 2014-07-30 | |
Authors | Paul E. Hoffman , James M. Snell | |
I-D last updated | 2014-08-05 | |
Completed reviews |
Genart Last Call review of -06
by Joel M. Halpern
(diff)
Opsdir Last Call review of -06 by Bert Wijnen (diff) Opsdir Telechat review of -07 by Benoît Claise |
|
Assignment | Reviewer | Bert Wijnen |
State | Completed | |
Request | Last Call review on draft-ietf-appsawg-json-merge-patch by Ops Directorate Assigned | |
Reviewed revision | 06 (document currently at 07) | |
Result | Ready | |
Completed | 2014-08-05 |
review-ietf-appsawg-json-merge-patch-06-opsdir-lc-wijnen-2014-08-05-00
Hi, I did ops-dir review for draft-ietf-appsawg-json-merge-patch-06.txt I basically looked at any Operational and Network Management aspects of the document. I see none that have any special impact from that point of view. I do see in the acknowledgements section: [[ NOTE: If you contributed and we missed your name, please let us know. ]] Is that intended to stay in the RFC? I have not seen this before (at least not in an RFC) An RFC is immutable, so at that point it would not be changed anymore. Bert