Last Call Review of draft-ietf-appsawg-rfc3462bis-
review-ietf-appsawg-rfc3462bis-genart-lc-even-2011-11-20-00
| Request | Review of | draft-ietf-appsawg-rfc3462bis |
|---|---|---|
| Requested revision | No specific revision (document currently at 04) | |
| Type | Last Call Review | |
| Team | General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) (genart) | |
| Deadline | 2011-11-26 | |
| Requested | 2011-11-03 | |
| Authors | Murray Kucherawy | |
| I-D last updated | 2011-11-20 | |
| Completed reviews |
Genart Last Call review of -??
by Roni Even
Genart Last Call review of -?? by Roni Even Secdir Last Call review of -?? by Brian Weis |
|
| Assignment | Reviewer | Roni Even |
| State | Completed | |
| Request | Last Call review on draft-ietf-appsawg-rfc3462bis by General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) Assigned | |
| Completed | 2011-11-20 |
review-ietf-appsawg-rfc3462bis-genart-lc-even-2011-11-20-00
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at <http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq>. Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call comments you may receive. Document: draft-ietf-appsawg-rfc3462bis-01 Reviewer: Roni Even Review Date: 2011–10–1 IETF LC End Date: 2011–10–10 IESG Telechat date: Summary: This draft is almost ready for publication as an informational RFC. Major issues: Minor issues: I noticed that the major change from RFC 3462 in the current version is to remove requirement that multipart/report not be contained in anything. The changes appear in appendix B which is to be removed in the published document. I think that it will be better to have the change from RFC 3462 be part of the main text and also discuss what are the backward interoperability issues if any. Nits/editorial comments: