Last Call Review of draft-ietf-appsawg-text-markdown-08
review-ietf-appsawg-text-markdown-08-opsdir-lc-brownlee-2015-06-30-00
Request | Review of | draft-ietf-appsawg-text-markdown |
---|---|---|
Requested revision | No specific revision (document currently at 12) | |
Type | Last Call Review | |
Team | Ops Directorate (opsdir) | |
Deadline | 2015-07-02 | |
Requested | 2015-06-23 | |
Authors | Sean Leonard | |
I-D last updated | 2015-06-30 | |
Completed reviews |
Genart Last Call review of -07
by Suresh Krishnan
(diff)
Genart Last Call review of -08 by Suresh Krishnan (diff) Secdir Last Call review of -08 by Shaun Cooley (diff) Opsdir Last Call review of -08 by Nevil Brownlee (diff) |
|
Assignment | Reviewer | Nevil Brownlee |
State | Completed | |
Request | Last Call review on draft-ietf-appsawg-text-markdown by Ops Directorate Assigned | |
Reviewed revision | 08 (document currently at 12) | |
Result | Has issues | |
Completed | 2015-06-30 |
review-ietf-appsawg-text-markdown-08-opsdir-lc-brownlee-2015-06-30-00
Hi all: I have performed an Operations Directorate review of draft-ietf-appsawg-text-markdown-08 "This document registers the text/markdown media type for use with Markdown, a family of plain text formatting syntaxes that optionally can be converted to formal markup languages such as HTML." - - - - In a little more detail, this draft explains what markdown is, asks to register a text/markdown Media Type (using the template set out in RFC 6838), and also to create a Registry called Markdown Variants that will contain the names of commonly-used variants. I have two issues: 1. The last sentence of the request for a Markdown Variants Registry (section 6.1) says '[MDMTUSES] includes additional registrations,' but MDMTUSES is an informational reference. If the variants it describes are to go into the Registry, should it be a normative reference? 2. The markdown Example (Section 5) is helpful, but it doesn't seem to have an obvious end marker - it just runs on into section 6. Does markdown have something like an end-of-file marker you could use to make that obvious? Apart from these minor quibbles, a good document, ready for publication. Cheers, Nevil Ex Co-chair, EMAN WG (now closed) Ex Co-chair, IPFIX WG (now closed) -- --------------------------------------------------------------------- Nevil Brownlee Computer Science Department Phone: +64 9 373 7599 x88941 The University of Auckland FAX: +64 9 373 7453 Private Bag 92019, Auckland 1142, New Zealand