Last Call Review of draft-ietf-appsawg-uri-scheme-reg-04
review-ietf-appsawg-uri-scheme-reg-04-opsdir-lc-wu-2015-03-11-00

Folks:

I have reviewed this document as part of the Operational directorate's ongoing
effort to review all IETF documents being processed by the IESG.  These
comments were written with the intent of improving the operational
 aspects of the IETF drafts. Comments that are not addressed in last call may
 be included in AD reviews during the IESG review.  Document editors and WG
 chairs should treat these comments just like any other last call comments.



This draft discusses Guidelines and Registration Procedures for URI Schemes. It
looks Operations and Management Review Checklist defined in RFC5706 doesn't
apply since there is no new protocol or protocol extension
 defined in this draft.

I think this draft is ready for publication. Here are a few editorial comments:



1.



Section 1, last two paragraphs

s/Interationalized/Internationalized

s/accomodate/accommodate

2.



Section 1, last two paragraphs

It looks these two paragraphs more fit into Scheme definition requirements
section, why split it out from section 3? would it be good to incorporate these
two paragraphs into section 3, No,?



3.



Section 3, the 6

th

 paragraph said:

“

The URI scheme name registration procedure can be used in such an event.

”

Pointing to section 7 would be good.



4.



Section 4 and 5

Are there guidelines for permanent URI Scheme Registration if there is
permanent URI Scheme Registration? Or Permanent URI Scheme Registration can
only be possible by upgrading provision URI Scheme Registration?



-Qin