Last Call Review of draft-ietf-avtcore-rfc7983bis-07
review-ietf-avtcore-rfc7983bis-07-artart-lc-blanchet-2023-01-09-00
| Request | Review of | draft-ietf-avtcore-rfc7983bis |
|---|---|---|
| Requested revision | No specific revision (document currently at 09) | |
| Type | Last Call Review | |
| Team | ART Area Review Team (artart) | |
| Deadline | 2023-01-17 | |
| Requested | 2023-01-03 | |
| Authors | Dr. Bernard D. Aboba , Gonzalo Salgueiro , Colin Perkins | |
| I-D last updated | 2023-01-09 | |
| Completed reviews |
Opsdir Last Call review of -07
by Dan Romascanu
(diff)
Genart Last Call review of -07 by Meral Shirazipour (diff) Tsvart Last Call review of -07 by Yoshifumi Nishida (diff) Artart Last Call review of -07 by Marc Blanchet (diff) Secdir Last Call review of -07 by Rich Salz (diff) Intdir Telechat review of -08 by Bernie Volz (diff) |
|
| Assignment | Reviewer | Marc Blanchet |
| State | Completed | |
| Request | Last Call review on draft-ietf-avtcore-rfc7983bis by ART Area Review Team Assigned | |
| Posted at | https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/art/6XD3ODz8YPo4ps6yIIe1BgQnZNI | |
| Reviewed revision | 07 (document currently at 09) | |
| Result | Ready | |
| Completed | 2023-01-09 |
review-ietf-avtcore-rfc7983bis-07-artart-lc-blanchet-2023-01-09-00
I have reviewed version -07. I did not read the identified references, so I can't tell if the various code points cited are right or that the specification is correct or not, but I found the document clear and makes sense, given that source IP address and port will be different for QUIC compared to TURN so it could be demultiplexed. I used to be on i18n directorate (which merged into ART) to review i18n related issues, so, on that topic, I see no i18n issues at all. One possible nit (English is not my native language): s/Were SRTP to be/Where SRTP to be/