Skip to main content

Last Call Review of draft-ietf-avtext-framemarking-13

Request Review of draft-ietf-avtext-framemarking
Requested revision No specific revision (document currently at 16)
Type Last Call Review
Team General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) (genart)
Deadline 2022-04-08
Requested 2022-03-25
Authors Mo Zanaty , Espen Berger , Suhas Nandakumar
I-D last updated 2022-04-02
Completed reviews Genart Last Call review of -13 by Gyan Mishra (diff)
Artart Last Call review of -13 by Martin Thomson (diff)
Opsdir Last Call review of -13 by Bo Wu (diff)
Secdir Last Call review of -13 by Carl Wallace (diff)
Opsdir Telechat review of -14 by Bo Wu (diff)
Assignment Reviewer Gyan Mishra
State Completed
Request Last Call review on draft-ietf-avtext-framemarking by General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) Assigned
Posted at
Reviewed revision 13 (document currently at 16)
Result Ready
Completed 2022-04-02
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area
Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed
by the IESG for the IETF Chair.  Please treat these comments just
like any other last call comments.

For more information, please see the FAQ at


Document: draft-ietf-avtext-framemarking-??
Reviewer: Gyan Mishra
Review Date: 2022-04-02
IETF LC End Date: 2022-04-08
IESG Telechat date: Not scheduled for a telechat


This document describes a Frame Marking RTP header extension used to convey
information about video frames that is critical for error recovery and packet
forwarding in RTP middleboxes or network nodes.

Major issues:

Minor issues:

Nits/editorial comments:
The document is well written and ready for publication.   As this is an
experimental what is the scope and length for f the time for the experiment?
What is the goal after the experiment is concluded? This should be stated in
the draft.  I see there are IANA considerations and how does that change if any
for allocations once the experiment concludes and this draft progresses to an
IETF standard.