Last Call Review of draft-ietf-avtext-framemarking-13
review-ietf-avtext-framemarking-13-genart-lc-mishra-2022-04-02-00
Request | Review of | draft-ietf-avtext-framemarking |
---|---|---|
Requested revision | No specific revision (document currently at 16) | |
Type | Last Call Review | |
Team | General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) (genart) | |
Deadline | 2022-04-08 | |
Requested | 2022-03-25 | |
Authors | Mo Zanaty , Espen Berger , Suhas Nandakumar | |
I-D last updated | 2022-04-02 | |
Completed reviews |
Genart Last Call review of -13
by Gyan Mishra
(diff)
Artart Last Call review of -13 by Martin Thomson (diff) Opsdir Last Call review of -13 by Bo Wu (diff) Secdir Last Call review of -13 by Carl Wallace (diff) Opsdir Telechat review of -14 by Bo Wu (diff) |
|
Assignment | Reviewer | Gyan Mishra |
State | Completed | |
Request | Last Call review on draft-ietf-avtext-framemarking by General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) Assigned | |
Posted at | https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/gen-art/I-fIfxfS98c6BVePYcpjP3Hf7ng | |
Reviewed revision | 13 (document currently at 16) | |
Result | Ready | |
Completed | 2022-04-02 |
review-ietf-avtext-framemarking-13-genart-lc-mishra-2022-04-02-00
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please treat these comments just like any other last call comments. For more information, please see the FAQ at <https://trac.ietf.org/trac/gen/wiki/GenArtfaq>. Document: draft-ietf-avtext-framemarking-?? Reviewer: Gyan Mishra Review Date: 2022-04-02 IETF LC End Date: 2022-04-08 IESG Telechat date: Not scheduled for a telechat Summary: This document describes a Frame Marking RTP header extension used to convey information about video frames that is critical for error recovery and packet forwarding in RTP middleboxes or network nodes. Major issues: None Minor issues: None Nits/editorial comments: The document is well written and ready for publication. As this is an experimental what is the scope and length for f the time for the experiment? What is the goal after the experiment is concluded? This should be stated in the draft. I see there are IANA considerations and how does that change if any for allocations once the experiment concludes and this draft progresses to an IETF standard.