Last Call Review of draft-ietf-avtext-framemarking-13
review-ietf-avtext-framemarking-13-secdir-lc-wallace-2022-04-11-00
| Request | Review of | draft-ietf-avtext-framemarking |
|---|---|---|
| Requested revision | No specific revision (document currently at 16) | |
| Type | Last Call Review | |
| Team | Security Area Directorate (secdir) | |
| Deadline | 2022-04-08 | |
| Requested | 2022-03-25 | |
| Authors | Mo Zanaty , Espen Berger , Suhas Nandakumar | |
| I-D last updated | 2022-04-11 | |
| Completed reviews |
Genart Last Call review of -13
by Gyan Mishra
(diff)
Artart Last Call review of -13 by Martin Thomson (diff) Opsdir Last Call review of -13 by Bo Wu (diff) Secdir Last Call review of -13 by Carl Wallace (diff) Opsdir Telechat review of -14 by Bo Wu (diff) |
|
| Assignment | Reviewer | Carl Wallace |
| State | Completed | |
| Request | Last Call review on draft-ietf-avtext-framemarking by Security Area Directorate Assigned | |
| Posted at | https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/secdir/NE9voCsSMXrKEOWQSP880venwAg | |
| Reviewed revision | 13 (document currently at 16) | |
| Result | Ready | |
| Completed | 2022-04-11 |
review-ietf-avtext-framemarking-13-secdir-lc-wallace-2022-04-11-00
This is an experimental document that describes a Frame Marking RTP header extension used to convey information about video frames that is critical for error recovery and packet forwarding in RTP middleboxes or network nodes. It is well written and ready to go. The only minor comment I had was that the security considerations may benefit from a reference to the security considerations in RFC 8285, if only to pull in the SHOULD regarding header integrity protection.