Last Call Review of draft-ietf-avtext-rid-04
review-ietf-avtext-rid-04-opsdir-lc-schoenwaelder-2016-08-08-00

I have reviewed this document as part of the Operational directorate's
ongoing effort to review all IETF documents being processed by the
IESG.  These comments were written with the intent of improving the
operational aspects of the IETF drafts. Comments that are not
addressed in last call may be included in AD reviews during the IESG
review.  Document editors and WG chairs should treat these comments
just like any other last call comments.

  Document: draft-ietf-avtext-rid-06
  Status: Ready

These two sentences below seem to need improvement ('... when the
encoding media' and 'that set of headers'):

   To avoid Maximum Transmission Unit (MTU) issues for
   the RTP packets, the header extension's size needs to be taken into
   account when the encoding media.  Note that set of header extensions
   included in the packet needs to be padded to the next 32-bit boundary
   [RFC5285].

The last paragraph in the IANA Considerations seems to be misplaced;
it is really about security considerations that the text in the
Security Considerations section is much better than the simple claim
that the SDES items never reveal privacy information. I suggest to
simply delete the last paragraph in the IANA Considerations section.

s/impelementors/implementors/

/js

-- 
Juergen Schoenwaelder           Jacobs University Bremen gGmbH
Phone: +49 421 200 3587         Campus Ring 1 | 28759 Bremen | Germany
Fax:   +49 421 200 3103         <

http://www.jacobs-university.de/

>