Last Call Review of draft-ietf-avtext-rtp-grouping-taxonomy-06

Request Review of draft-ietf-avtext-rtp-grouping-taxonomy
Requested rev. no specific revision (document currently at 08)
Type Last Call Review
Team Ops Directorate (opsdir)
Deadline 2015-07-07
Requested 2015-05-08
Authors Jonathan Lennox, Kevin Gross, Suhas Nandakumar, Gonzalo Salgueiro, Bo Burman
Draft last updated 2015-07-13
Completed reviews Genart Last Call review of -06 by Robert Sparks (diff)
Genart Telechat review of -07 by Robert Sparks (diff)
Secdir Last Call review of -06 by Paul Hoffman (diff)
Opsdir Last Call review of -06 by Menachem Dodge (diff)
Assignment Reviewer Menachem Dodge 
State Completed
Review review-ietf-avtext-rtp-grouping-taxonomy-06-opsdir-lc-dodge-2015-07-13
Reviewed rev. 06 (document currently at 08)
Review result Ready
Review completed: 2015-07-13



I have reviewed this document as part of the Operational directorate's ongoing effort to review all IETF documents being processed by the IESG.  These comments were written with the intent of improving the operational aspects of the IETF drafts. Comments that are not addressed in last call may be included in AD reviews during the IESG review.  Document editors and WG chairs should treat these comments just like any other last call comments.

This document is for the Informational Track.

This document describes some existing and proposed properties and relationships among RTP sources, and defines common terminology for discussing protocol entities and their relationships. The aim of this document is to clarify any confusion that may be prevalent due to inconsistent usage by multiple technologies and protocols that are making use of RTP.

The document is well written.

The nits tool has found the following:

  == Outdated reference: A later version (-08) exists of

  == Outdated reference: A later version (-10) exists of

Unfortunately, I have not had time to make an in depth review of this document, 

However, I have made a brief review of the document and have found no issues.

Thank you kindly,