Skip to main content

Last Call Review of draft-ietf-avtext-splicing-notification-07
review-ietf-avtext-splicing-notification-07-secdir-lc-miller-2016-06-02-00

Request Review of draft-ietf-avtext-splicing-notification
Requested revision No specific revision (document currently at 09)
Type Last Call Review
Team Security Area Directorate (secdir)
Deadline 2016-06-01
Requested 2016-05-26
Authors Jinwei Xia , Roni Even , Rachel Huang , Deng Lingli
I-D last updated 2016-06-02
Completed reviews Genart Last Call review of -04 by Matthew A. Miller (diff)
Genart Last Call review of -07 by Matthew A. Miller (diff)
Secdir Last Call review of -04 by Matthew A. Miller (diff)
Secdir Last Call review of -07 by Matthew A. Miller (diff)
Opsdir Last Call review of -04 by Ron Bonica (diff)
Assignment Reviewer Matthew A. Miller
State Completed
Request Last Call review on draft-ietf-avtext-splicing-notification by Security Area Directorate Assigned
Reviewed revision 07 (document currently at 09)
Result Has nits
Completed 2016-06-02
review-ietf-avtext-splicing-notification-07-secdir-lc-miller-2016-06-02-00
I am the coincidentally-assigned Gen-ART and SecDir reviewer
for this draft. The General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF
documents being processed by the IESG for the IETF Chair.  The Security
Directorate reviews all IETF documents being processed by the IESG for
the security area directors.  Please treat these comments just like any
other last call comments that arrived on time.

For more information on Gen-Art, please see the FAQ at

< 

http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq

 >.

Document: draft-ietf-avtext-splicing-notification-07
Reviewer: Matthew A. Miller
Review Date: 2016-06-02
IETF LC End Date: 2016-06-01
IESG Telechat date: N/A

Summary:

This document is ready to be published as a Proposed Standard
once the nit is taken care of.

I reviewed a previous revision of this document (-04), and all of my
concerns from the earlier review are addressed herein.

I note this document includes normative references to two Informational
documents (RFCs 7201 and 7667).  The references are important to
properly understand some of the security considerations of this
document, but it appears the responsible AD is to add them to the
approved downrefs registry.


Major issues: N/A

Minor issues: N/A

Nits/editorial comments:

* In Section 7 "Security Considerations", "the" is missing between
"Since" and "splicer" in the first sentence of the third paragraph.


--
- m&m

Matt Miller
Cisco Systems, Inc.



Attachment:


signature.asc




Description:

 Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail