Last Call Review of draft-ietf-behave-64-analysis-
review-ietf-behave-64-analysis-secdir-lc-tsou-2012-02-23-00

Request Review of draft-ietf-behave-64-analysis
Requested rev. no specific revision (document currently at 07)
Type Last Call Review
Team Security Area Directorate (secdir)
Deadline 2012-02-28
Requested 2012-02-05
Authors Reinaldo Penno, Tarun Saxena, Mohamed Boucadair, Senthil Sivakumar
Draft last updated 2012-02-23
Completed reviews Genart Telechat review of -?? by David Black
Secdir Last Call review of -?? by Tina Tsou
Assignment Reviewer Tina Tsou 
State Completed
Review review-ietf-behave-64-analysis-secdir-lc-tsou-2012-02-23
Review completed: 2012-02-23

Review
review-ietf-behave-64-analysis-secdir-lc-tsou-2012-02-23

I don't see any security concerns as we don't define any new protocol.
I have a small suggestion though:
The Abstract of the draft somehow doesn't truly reflect the actual description of the draft. This draft analyzes how NAT 64 confirms to RFC 4966, which problems mentioned in 4966 are solved, which are not solved etc. Whereas the abstract mentions "This document evaluate how the new stateful translation mechanisms avoid the problems that caused the IETF to deprecate NAT-PT." I think we can be more specific here.

Sent from my iPad