Early Review of draft-ietf-bess-evpn-mh-split-horizon-08
review-ietf-bess-evpn-mh-split-horizon-08-genart-early-korhonen-2024-06-06-00

Request Review of draft-ietf-bess-evpn-mh-split-horizon-08
Requested revision 08 (document currently at 11)
Type Early Review
Team General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) (genart)
Deadline 2024-06-06
Requested 2024-05-16
Requested by Zhaohui (Jeffrey) Zhang
Authors Jorge Rabadan , Kiran Nagaraj , Wen Lin , Ali Sajassi
I-D last updated 2025-03-06 (Latest revision 2024-08-17)
Completed reviews Genart Early review of -08 by Jouni Korhonen (diff)
Rtgdir Early review of -04 by Himanshu C. Shah (diff)
Secdir IETF Last Call review of -09 by Yaron Sheffer (diff)
Opsdir IETF Last Call review of -10 by Susan Hares (diff)
Secdir Telechat review of -10 by Yaron Sheffer (diff)
Assignment Reviewer Jouni Korhonen
State Completed
Request Early review on draft-ietf-bess-evpn-mh-split-horizon by General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) Assigned
Posted at https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/gen-art/YbxRD9_5sIx_0xYgnaKLDLXpgtc
Reviewed revision 08 (document currently at 11)
Result Ready w/nits
Completed 2024-06-06
review-ietf-bess-evpn-mh-split-horizon-08-genart-early-korhonen-2024-06-06-00
I am an assigned GEN-ART directorate reviewer for
draft-ietf-bess-evpn-mh-split-horizon-08.

Summary: Ready with nits

Overall I found the document ready for publication. I have not followed the
topic thus I abstain myself from technical commentary.

Editorial nits:
1) In Section 1.1 Introduction the acronyms are used without a) expanding them
on the first use and/or b) before Section 1.2 Conventions and Terminology. Take
ES, ESI, AC, BUM, A-D as examples. Expand and/or rearrange sections. 2)  Some
acronyms are not expanded at all in the document. I admit most are common &
known within MPLS etc genres but still.. Take PE as an example. 3) No acronym
introduction is Section name (i.e. Section 2.1)