Last Call Review of draft-ietf-bess-evpn-na-flags-05
review-ietf-bess-evpn-na-flags-05-intdir-lc-weber-2020-08-28-00

Request Review of draft-ietf-bess-evpn-na-flags
Requested revision No specific revision (document currently at 09)
Type IETF Last Call Review
Team Internet Area Directorate (intdir)
Deadline 2020-08-28
Requested 2020-08-14
Requested by Éric Vyncke
Authors Jorge Rabadan , Senthil Sathappan , Kiran Nagaraj , Wen Lin
I-D last updated 2021-06-22 (Latest revision 2020-12-01)
Completed reviews Intdir IETF Last Call review of -05 by Ralf Weber (diff)
Genart IETF Last Call review of -05 by Robert Sparks (diff)
Secdir IETF Last Call review of -05 by Mališa Vučinić (diff)
Secdir Telechat review of -06 by Mališa Vučinić (diff)
Assignment Reviewer Ralf Weber
State Completed
Request IETF Last Call review on draft-ietf-bess-evpn-na-flags by Internet Area Directorate Assigned
Posted at https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/int-dir/a7p3WboZbUR6SqIoST3HezR6Dvg
Reviewed revision 05 (document currently at 09)
Result Ready
Completed 2020-08-28
review-ietf-bess-evpn-na-flags-05-intdir-lc-weber-2020-08-28-00
Moin!

I am an assigned INT directorate reviewer for draft-ietf-bess-evpn-na-flags.

These comments were written primarily for the benefit of the Internet Area
Directors. Document editors and shepherd(s) should treat these comments just
like they would treat comments from any other IETF contributors and resolve
them along with any other Last Call comments that have been received. For more
details on the INT Directorate, see
https://datatracker.ietf.org/group/intdir/about/

The draft does a very good job explaining the motivation, definition and use of
the extended community flags with good and applicable examples. I personally
would have used stronger (MUST) language for the R and O bits set to 0 on the
IPv4->MAC transmission (3.1 sub point 2), but as these are optional anyway and
must be ignored by the receiver it really makes no difference.

So long
-Ralf