Last Call Review of draft-ietf-bess-evpn-oam-req-frmwk-04
review-ietf-bess-evpn-oam-req-frmwk-04-genart-lc-schinazi-2021-02-05-00
Request | Review of | draft-ietf-bess-evpn-oam-req-frmwk |
---|---|---|
Requested revision | No specific revision (document currently at 10) | |
Type | Last Call Review | |
Team | General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) (genart) | |
Deadline | 2021-02-16 | |
Requested | 2021-02-02 | |
Authors | Samer Salam , Ali Sajassi , Sam Aldrin , John Drake , Donald E. Eastlake 3rd | |
I-D last updated | 2021-02-05 | |
Completed reviews |
Rtgdir Last Call review of -04
by Stig Venaas
(diff)
Secdir Last Call review of -04 by Melinda Shore (diff) Genart Last Call review of -04 by David Schinazi (diff) Tsvart Last Call review of -04 by David L. Black (diff) Secdir Telechat review of -07 by Melinda Shore (diff) |
|
Assignment | Reviewer | David Schinazi |
State | Completed | |
Request | Last Call review on draft-ietf-bess-evpn-oam-req-frmwk by General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) Assigned | |
Posted at | https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/gen-art/e5VvK_YVk6KP_-hkwKHp0cJZPDU | |
Reviewed revision | 04 (document currently at 10) | |
Result | Ready w/nits | |
Completed | 2021-02-05 |
review-ietf-bess-evpn-oam-req-frmwk-04-genart-lc-schinazi-2021-02-05-00
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please treat these comments just like any other last call comments. For more information, please see the FAQ at <https://trac.ietf.org/trac/gen/wiki/GenArtfaq>. Document: draft-ietf-bess-evpn-oam-req-frmwk-04 Reviewer: David Schinazi Review Date: 2021-02-05 IETF LC End Date: 2021-02-16 IESG Telechat date: Not scheduled for a telechat Summary: Thank you for a well-written document. It introduces a lot of terminology I wasn't used to, but does a good job of explaining it. Major issues: None Minor issues: None Nits/editorial comments: - The abstract defines all the acronyms (which is great) except PBB, could it define that one too? - Section 2.1 doesn't really explain what a "P node" is.