Last Call Review of draft-ietf-bess-evpn-overlay-10
review-ietf-bess-evpn-overlay-10-genart-lc-gurbani-2017-12-21-00

Request Review of draft-ietf-bess-evpn-overlay
Requested revision No specific revision (document currently at 12)
Type Last Call Review
Team General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) (genart)
Deadline 2017-12-22
Requested 2017-12-08
Authors Ali Sajassi , John Drake , Nabil Bitar , Ravi Shekhar , Jim Uttaro , Wim Henderickx
I-D last updated 2017-12-21
Completed reviews Rtgdir Early review of -04 by Keyur Patel (diff)
Rtgdir Early review of -04 by IJsbrand Wijnands (diff)
Rtgdir Telechat review of -10 by Lou Berger (diff)
Opsdir Last Call review of -10 by Fred Baker (diff)
Genart Last Call review of -10 by Vijay K. Gurbani (diff)
Assignment Reviewer Vijay K. Gurbani
State Completed Snapshot
Review review-ietf-bess-evpn-overlay-10-genart-lc-gurbani-2017-12-21
Reviewed revision 10 (document currently at 12)
Result Ready w/issues
Completed 2017-12-21
The information below is for an old version of the document.
review-ietf-bess-evpn-overlay-10-genart-lc-gurbani-2017-12-21-00
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area
Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed
by the IESG for the IETF Chair.  Please treat these comments just
like any other last call comments.

For more information, please see the FAQ at

<https://trac.ietf.org/trac/gen/wiki/GenArtfaq>.

Document: draft-ietf-bess-evpn-overlay-??
Reviewer: Vijay Gurbani
Review Date: 2017-12-21
IETF LC End Date: 2017-12-22
IESG Telechat date: 2018-01-11

Summary: The draft is ready as a PS.  It has one Minor issue that needs some
discussion.

Major issues: None.

Minor issues: One.

Nits/editorial comments:  None.

Minor issues:
In S13 (IANA Considerations), I am not sure whether this draft is allocating
the tunnel types or not.  The responsible IANA registry [0] shows that the
tunnel types mentioned in this draft are already allocated through a precursor
individual draft [1], which has long expired.  However, when I look at the IANA
Consideration section in [1], it is empty!  So I am not sure how the IANA
registry in [0] received the allocations.  I think the IANA section of this
draft needs to be updated accordingly.

[0]
https://www.iana.org/assignments/bgp-parameters/bgp-parameters.xhtml#tunnel-types
[1] http://www.iana.org/go/draft-sd-l2vpn-evpn-overlay (the expired individual
draft itself is at https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-sd-l2vpn-evpn-overlay-03)