Last Call Review of draft-ietf-bess-evpn-usage-08
review-ietf-bess-evpn-usage-08-opsdir-lc-jiang-2018-02-22-00
Request | Review of | draft-ietf-bess-evpn-usage |
---|---|---|
Requested revision | No specific revision (document currently at 09) | |
Type | Last Call Review | |
Team | Ops Directorate (opsdir) | |
Deadline | 2018-02-09 | |
Requested | 2018-01-26 | |
Authors | Jorge Rabadan , Senad Palislamovic , Wim Henderickx , Ali Sajassi , Jim Uttaro | |
I-D last updated | 2018-02-22 | |
Completed reviews |
Rtgdir Telechat review of -08
by Russ White
(diff)
Opsdir Last Call review of -08 by Sheng Jiang (diff) Secdir Last Call review of -07 by Stephen Kent (diff) Genart Last Call review of -07 by Roni Even (diff) |
|
Assignment | Reviewer | Sheng Jiang |
State | Completed | |
Request | Last Call review on draft-ietf-bess-evpn-usage by Ops Directorate Assigned | |
Reviewed revision | 08 (document currently at 09) | |
Result | Ready | |
Completed | 2018-02-22 |
review-ietf-bess-evpn-usage-08-opsdir-lc-jiang-2018-02-22-00
I have reviewed this document as part of the Operational directorate's ongoing effort to review all IETF documents being processed by the IESG. These comments were written with the intent of improving the operational aspects of the IETF drafts. Comments that are not addressed in last call may be included in AD reviews during the IESG review. Document editors and WG chairs should treat these comments just like any other last call comments. This Informational document discusses the usage and applicability of BGP MPLS based Ethernet VPN (EVPN) in a common deployment scenario. This document is well written. It is ready with minor issues. Major issue: no. Minor issue: no. Personal comments: although this document claims it focuses on a "simple" and fairly common deployment scenario, it is still complicated giving many aspects of EVPN. It is hard to read giving the many technical details. I am thinking it may helpful for readers if there was a minimum scenario to be described. Overall, the document is well written and useful already. So please feel safe to ignore my personal suggestion. Regards, Sheng