Last Call Review of draft-ietf-bess-evpn-vpls-seamless-integ-05
review-ietf-bess-evpn-vpls-seamless-integ-05-opsdir-lc-dunbar-2018-12-18-00

Request Review of draft-ietf-bess-evpn-vpls-seamless-integ
Requested revision No specific revision (document currently at 07)
Type Last Call Review
Team Ops Directorate (opsdir)
Deadline 2018-12-18
Requested 2018-12-04
Authors Ali Sajassi , Samer Salam , Nick Del Regno , Jorge Rabadan
I-D last updated 2018-12-18
Completed reviews Rtgdir Last Call review of -04 by Yingzhen Qu (diff)
Genart Last Call review of -05 by Pete Resnick (diff)
Opsdir Last Call review of -05 by Linda Dunbar (diff)
Secdir Last Call review of -05 by Stephen Kent (diff)
Assignment Reviewer Linda Dunbar
State Completed
Request Last Call review on draft-ietf-bess-evpn-vpls-seamless-integ by Ops Directorate Assigned
Reviewed revision 05 (document currently at 07)
Result Ready
Completed 2018-12-18
review-ietf-bess-evpn-vpls-seamless-integ-05-opsdir-lc-dunbar-2018-12-18-00
Reviewer: Linda Dunbar
Review result: Ready with comments

I have reviewed this document as part of the Operational directorate's
ongoing effort to review all IETF documents being processed by the IESG.  These
comments were written with the intent of improving the operational aspects of
the IETF drafts. Comments that are not addressed in last call may be included
in AD reviews during the IESG review.  Document editors and WG chairs should
treat these comments just like any other last call comments.

The draft describes the procedures for EVPN PEs to handle traffic from VPLS
PEs, to enable smooth transition from VPLS network to EVPN network. The
procedures are written very clear, (although I am not sure why it is a Standard
Track document as the document is mainly in describing the procedures of PEs
that support both EVPN & VPLS).

Question to the authors:

Page 8 Section 3.2: why set up the PW if keep it operationally down?

Best Regards,
Linda Dunbar