Early Review of draft-ietf-bess-mvpn-evpn-sr-p2mp-09
review-ietf-bess-mvpn-evpn-sr-p2mp-09-intdir-early-winters-2024-10-31-00
| Request | Review of | draft-ietf-bess-mvpn-evpn-sr-p2mp |
|---|---|---|
| Requested revision | No specific revision (document currently at 11) | |
| Type | Early Review | |
| Team | Internet Area Directorate (intdir) | |
| Deadline | 2024-10-30 | |
| Requested | 2024-09-06 | |
| Requested by | Mankamana Prasad Mishra | |
| Authors | Rishabh Parekh , Clarence Filsfils , Mankamana Prasad Mishra , Hooman Bidgoli , Daniel Voyer , Zhaohui (Jeffrey) Zhang | |
| I-D last updated | 2024-10-31 | |
| Completed reviews |
Rtgdir Early review of -11
by Jonathan Hardwick
Intdir Early review of -09 by Timothy Winters (diff) |
|
| Comments |
Document in Last call queue. Requesting early review |
|
| Assignment | Reviewer | Timothy Winters |
| State | Completed | |
| Request | Early review on draft-ietf-bess-mvpn-evpn-sr-p2mp by Internet Area Directorate Assigned | |
| Posted at | https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/int-dir/6l5JyA380UZFMOcgC9ygpXn8G3U | |
| Reviewed revision | 09 (document currently at 11) | |
| Result | Ready w/nits | |
| Completed | 2024-10-31 |
review-ietf-bess-mvpn-evpn-sr-p2mp-09-intdir-early-winters-2024-10-31-00
I am an assigned INT directorate reviewer for draft-ietf-bess-mvpn-evpn-sr-p2mp. These comments were written primarily for the benefit of the Internet Area Directors. Document editors and shepherd(s) should treat these comments just like they would treat comments from any other IETF contributors and resolve them along with any other Last Call comments that have been received. For more details on the INT Directorate, see https://datatracker.ietf.org/group/intdir/about/ <https://datatracker.ietf.org/group/intdir/about/>. Summary: This document specifies Point-to-Multipoint in Segment Routing tree. It's dense routing document, but overall was readable. There are no Internet area issues with this document. NIT: I noticed several RFC 6514 and 7432 references didn't have the proper links, looking like normal text. This should be addressed. Based on my review, if I was on the IESG I would ballot this document as NO OBJECTION.