Last Call Review of draft-ietf-bfd-large-packets-14
review-ietf-bfd-large-packets-14-secdir-lc-salowey-2024-12-27-00

Request Review of draft-ietf-bfd-large-packets
Requested revision No specific revision (document currently at 16)
Type Last Call Review
Team Security Area Directorate (secdir)
Deadline 2024-12-09
Requested 2024-11-25
Authors Jeffrey Haas , Albert Fu
I-D last updated 2024-12-27
Completed reviews Yangdoctors Last Call review of -07 by Jürgen Schönwälder (diff)
Secdir Early review of -11 by Joseph A. Salowey (diff)
Genart Last Call review of -13 by Dan Romascanu (diff)
Secdir Last Call review of -14 by Joseph A. Salowey (diff)
Tsvart Last Call review of -14 by Brian Trammell (diff)
Assignment Reviewer Joseph A. Salowey
State Completed
Request Last Call review on draft-ietf-bfd-large-packets by Security Area Directorate Assigned
Posted at https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/secdir/-86wKjytGTRm9irqTEVD8APpwqc
Reviewed revision 14 (document currently at 16)
Result Has nits
Completed 2024-12-27
review-ietf-bfd-large-packets-14-secdir-lc-salowey-2024-12-27-00
I have reviewed this document as part of the security directorate's
ongoing effort to review all IETF documents being processed by the
IESG. These comments were written primarily for the benefit of the
security area directors. Document editors and WG chairs should treat
these comments just like any other last call comments.

The summary of the review is the document has minor issue.

Please see Brian Trammell's review.  I think he makes a good point about the
packet sizes changing to be dynamic. I think the authors should consider adding
a sentence about the change to dynamic packet size.