Skip to main content

Last Call Review of draft-ietf-bfd-rfc9127-bis-02
review-ietf-bfd-rfc9127-bis-02-rtgdir-lc-white-2022-03-06-00

Request Review of draft-ietf-bfd-rfc9127-bis
Requested revision No specific revision (document currently at 04)
Type Last Call Review
Team Routing Area Directorate (rtgdir)
Deadline 2022-02-04
Requested 2022-01-17
Requested by John Scudder
Authors Mahesh Jethanandani , Reshad Rahman , Lianshu Zheng , Santosh Pallagatti , Greg Mirsky
I-D last updated 2022-03-06
Completed reviews Rtgdir Last Call review of -02 by Russ White (diff)
Genart Last Call review of -01 by Joel M. Halpern (diff)
Yangdoctors Last Call review of -01 by Jan Lindblad (diff)
Assignment Reviewer Russ White
State Completed
Request Last Call review on draft-ietf-bfd-rfc9127-bis by Routing Area Directorate Assigned
Posted at https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rtg-dir/vcy8uI534tchyDbquXSdVhSYQOo
Reviewed revision 02 (document currently at 04)
Result Ready
Completed 2022-03-06
review-ietf-bfd-rfc9127-bis-02-rtgdir-lc-white-2022-03-06-00
Hello,

I have been selected as the Routing Directorate reviewer for this draft. The
Routing Directorate seeks to review all routing or routing-related drafts as
they pass through IETF last call and IESG review, and sometimes on special
request. The purpose of the review is to provide assistance to the Routing ADs.
For more information about the Routing Directorate, please see
​http://trac.tools.ietf.org/area/rtg/trac/wiki/RtgDir

Although these comments are primarily for the use of the Routing ADs, it would
be helpful if you could consider them along with any other IETF Last Call
comments that you receive, and strive to resolve them through discussion or by
updating the draft.

Document: draft-ietf-bfd-rfc9127-bis-02
Reviewer: Russ White
Review Date: 6 March 2022
IETF LC End Date: 3 FEbruary 2022
Intended Status: Standards Track

Summary:

No issues found. This document is ready for publication.

Comments:

Please supply an overview of the draft quality and readability.

This draft is well written and readable. It covers the topic fully. There are
just a few minor changes from the existing RFC.

Major Issues:

No major issues found.

Minor Issues:

No minor issues found.

==
/r