Last Call Review of draft-ietf-bfd-rfc9127-bis-02
review-ietf-bfd-rfc9127-bis-02-rtgdir-lc-white-2022-03-06-00
Request | Review of | draft-ietf-bfd-rfc9127-bis |
---|---|---|
Requested revision | No specific revision (document currently at 04) | |
Type | Last Call Review | |
Team | Routing Area Directorate (rtgdir) | |
Deadline | 2022-02-04 | |
Requested | 2022-01-17 | |
Requested by | John Scudder | |
Authors | Mahesh Jethanandani , Reshad Rahman , Lianshu Zheng , Santosh Pallagatti , Greg Mirsky | |
I-D last updated | 2022-03-06 | |
Completed reviews |
Rtgdir Last Call review of -02
by Russ White
(diff)
Genart Last Call review of -01 by Joel M. Halpern (diff) Yangdoctors Last Call review of -01 by Jan Lindblad (diff) |
|
Assignment | Reviewer | Russ White |
State | Completed | |
Request | Last Call review on draft-ietf-bfd-rfc9127-bis by Routing Area Directorate Assigned | |
Posted at | https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rtg-dir/vcy8uI534tchyDbquXSdVhSYQOo | |
Reviewed revision | 02 (document currently at 04) | |
Result | Ready | |
Completed | 2022-03-06 |
review-ietf-bfd-rfc9127-bis-02-rtgdir-lc-white-2022-03-06-00
Hello, I have been selected as the Routing Directorate reviewer for this draft. The Routing Directorate seeks to review all routing or routing-related drafts as they pass through IETF last call and IESG review, and sometimes on special request. The purpose of the review is to provide assistance to the Routing ADs. For more information about the Routing Directorate, please see http://trac.tools.ietf.org/area/rtg/trac/wiki/RtgDir Although these comments are primarily for the use of the Routing ADs, it would be helpful if you could consider them along with any other IETF Last Call comments that you receive, and strive to resolve them through discussion or by updating the draft. Document: draft-ietf-bfd-rfc9127-bis-02 Reviewer: Russ White Review Date: 6 March 2022 IETF LC End Date: 3 FEbruary 2022 Intended Status: Standards Track Summary: No issues found. This document is ready for publication. Comments: Please supply an overview of the draft quality and readability. This draft is well written and readable. It covers the topic fully. There are just a few minor changes from the existing RFC. Major Issues: No major issues found. Minor Issues: No minor issues found. == /r