Skip to main content

Last Call Review of draft-ietf-bfd-stability-08
review-ietf-bfd-stability-08-yangdoctors-lc-aries-2021-03-21-00

Request Review of draft-ietf-bfd-stability-08
Requested revision 08 (document currently at 12)
Type Last Call Review
Team YANG Doctors (yangdoctors)
Deadline 2021-04-05
Requested 2021-03-09
Requested by Reshad Rahman
Authors Ashesh Mishra , Mahesh Jethanandani , Ankur Saxena , Santosh Pallagatti , Mach Chen , Peng Fan
I-D last updated 2021-03-21
Completed reviews Yangdoctors Last Call review of -08 by Ebben Aries (diff)
Comments
WGLC discussions has led to addition of counters via augmentation of BFD YANG (in RFC Editor queue and in MISSREF for 900+ days) . The YANG model augment is very small.
Assignment Reviewer Ebben Aries
State Completed
Request Last Call review on draft-ietf-bfd-stability by YANG Doctors Assigned
Posted at https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/yang-doctors/rsYoOFHgZSLQaEcmdUD8mVgwo40
Reviewed revision 08 (document currently at 12)
Result Ready w/nits
Completed 2021-03-21
review-ietf-bfd-stability-08-yangdoctors-lc-aries-2021-03-21-00
One of the simpler YD reviews since this draft contains only a single module
with a single r/o leaf augment to various other BFD module nodes.

1 module in this draft:
- ietf-bfd-stability@2021-02-24.yang

YANG compiler errors or warnings (pyang 2.4.0, yanglint 1.10.17, confdc 7.2.3.4)
- warning: RFC 8407: 3.1: The IETF Trust Copyright statement seems to be missing
  - Minor issue just due to slight wording adjustment from copyright info
    normally used in the draft/RFC itself
    https://trustee.ietf.org/documents/trust-legal-provisions/tlp-5/


Module ietf-bfd-stability@2021-02-24.yang:
- Contact information should follow formatting seen in other published
  modules.  Just some minor cleanup/readjustments here.
- Various augments will augment the respective 'session-statistics' container
  however for 'bfd-lag:member-links/micro-bfd-ipv4',
  'bfd-lag:member-links/micro-bfd-ipv6' and 'bfd-mpls:sessions' these augments
  sit in parallel to that container.  Is there any reason this is not
  consistent?


General comments on the draft/modules:
- Section 7.2: It is stated the document registers "2" YANG modules when it is
  infact only a single module

Overall, just minor nits and view as ready from a YANG doctor review
standpoint once the above is addressed