Last Call Review of draft-ietf-bfd-stability-17
review-ietf-bfd-stability-17-rtgdir-lc-niven-jenkins-2025-03-20-00

Request Review of draft-ietf-bfd-stability-17
Requested revision 17 (document currently at 18)
Type IETF Last Call Review
Team Routing Area Directorate (rtgdir)
Deadline 2025-04-04
Requested 2025-03-06
Requested by Reshad Rahman
Authors Ashesh Mishra , Mahesh Jethanandani , Ankur Saxena , Santosh Pallagatti , Mach Chen
I-D last updated 2025-05-15 (Latest revision 2025-04-07)
Completed reviews Yangdoctors Early review of -13 by Ebben Aries (diff)
Secdir Early review of -13 by Christian Huitema (diff)
Yangdoctors IETF Last Call review of -08 by Ebben Aries (diff)
Rtgdir IETF Last Call review of -17 by Ben Niven-Jenkins (diff)
Opsdir Early review of -18 by Gyan Mishra
Comments 
As suggested by Ketan
Assignment Reviewer Ben Niven-Jenkins
State Completed
Request IETF Last Call review on draft-ietf-bfd-stability by Routing Area Directorate Assigned
Posted at https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rtg-dir/i2Al1U6kRhxW8FneQhkoF2eMGmU
Reviewed revision 17 (document currently at 18)
Result Ready
Completed 2025-03-20
review-ietf-bfd-stability-17-rtgdir-lc-niven-jenkins-2025-03-20-00
Hello,

I have been selected as the Routing Directorate reviewer for this draft. The
Routing Directorate seeks to review all routing or routing-related drafts as
they pass through IETF last call and IESG review, and sometimes on special
request. The purpose of the review is to provide assistance to the Routing ADs.
For more information about the Routing Directorate, please see
https://wiki.ietf.org/en/group/rtg/RtgDir

Although these comments are primarily for the use of the Routing ADs, it would
be helpful if you could consider them along with any other IETF Last Call
comments that you receive, and strive to resolve them through discussion or by
updating the draft.

Document: draft-ietf-bfd-stability-17
Reviewer: Ben Niven-Jenkins
Review Date: 2025-03-20
Intended Status: Experimental

Summary: No issues found. This document is ready for publication.

Comments: The document is easy to read and follow.

Major Issues: No major issues found.

Minor Issues: No minor issues found.