Last Call Review of draft-ietf-bfd-tc-mib-06
review-ietf-bfd-tc-mib-06-genart-lc-holmberg-2014-04-30-00
Request | Review of | draft-ietf-bfd-tc-mib |
---|---|---|
Requested revision | No specific revision (document currently at 08) | |
Type | Last Call Review | |
Team | General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) (genart) | |
Deadline | 2014-05-13 | |
Requested | 2014-04-16 | |
Authors | Thomas Nadeau , Zafar Ali , Nobo Akiya | |
I-D last updated | 2014-04-30 | |
Completed reviews |
Genart Last Call review of -06
by Christer Holmberg
(diff)
Genart Telechat review of -07 by Christer Holmberg (diff) Genart Telechat review of -08 by Christer Holmberg Secdir Last Call review of -05 by Warren "Ace" Kumari (diff) |
|
Assignment | Reviewer | Christer Holmberg |
State | Completed | |
Request | Last Call review on draft-ietf-bfd-tc-mib by General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) Assigned | |
Reviewed revision | 06 (document currently at 08) | |
Result | Ready w/nits | |
Completed | 2014-04-30 |
review-ietf-bfd-tc-mib-06-genart-lc-holmberg-2014-04-30-00
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at <http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq> Document: draft-ietf-bfd-tc-mib-06 Reviewer: Christer Holmberg Review Date: 30 April 2014 IETF LC End Date: 28 April 2014 IETF Telechat Date: 15 May 2014 Summary: The document is almost ready for publication, with a couple of minor nits that the authors may want to address. Major Issues: None Minor Issues: None Editorial nits: Section 1 (Introduction): --------------------------------- Q_1: s/”two MIB modules”/”two Management Information Base (MIB) modules” Section 4 (Security Considerations): ------------------------------------------------ Q_4: The last sentence says: “Therefore, this document has no impact on the security of the Internet.” That sounds a little funny :) Wouldn’t it be better to simply say: “Therefore, this document does not introduce any additional security considerations.” Regards, Christer