Skip to main content

Last Call Review of draft-ietf-bfd-tc-mib-06
review-ietf-bfd-tc-mib-06-genart-lc-holmberg-2014-04-30-00

Request Review of draft-ietf-bfd-tc-mib
Requested revision No specific revision (document currently at 08)
Type Last Call Review
Team General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) (genart)
Deadline 2014-05-13
Requested 2014-04-16
Authors Thomas Nadeau , Zafar Ali , Nobo Akiya
I-D last updated 2014-04-30
Completed reviews Genart Last Call review of -06 by Christer Holmberg (diff)
Genart Telechat review of -07 by Christer Holmberg (diff)
Genart Telechat review of -08 by Christer Holmberg
Secdir Last Call review of -05 by Warren "Ace" Kumari (diff)
Assignment Reviewer Christer Holmberg
State Completed
Request Last Call review on draft-ietf-bfd-tc-mib by General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) Assigned
Reviewed revision 06 (document currently at 08)
Result Ready w/nits
Completed 2014-04-30
review-ietf-bfd-tc-mib-06-genart-lc-holmberg-2014-04-30-00

I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on Gen-ART,
please see the FAQ at <http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq>



Document:                         draft-ietf-bfd-tc-mib-06



Reviewer:                           Christer Holmberg



Review Date:                     30 April 2014



IETF LC End Date:             28 April 2014



IETF Telechat Date:         15 May 2014



Summary:        The document is almost ready for publication, with a couple of
minor nits that the authors may want to address.



Major Issues: None



Minor Issues: None



Editorial nits:



Section 1 (Introduction):

---------------------------------



Q_1:





s/”two MIB modules”/”two Management Information Base (MIB) modules”







Section 4 (Security Considerations):

------------------------------------------------



Q_4:



The last sentence says:



“Therefore, this document has no impact on the security of the Internet.”



That sounds a little funny :) Wouldn’t it be better to simply say:



“Therefore, this document does not introduce any additional security
considerations.”





Regards,



Christer