Last Call Review of draft-ietf-bfd-unsolicited-11
review-ietf-bfd-unsolicited-11-secdir-lc-atkins-2022-12-04-00

Request Review of draft-ietf-bfd-unsolicited
Requested revision No specific revision (document currently at 16)
Type Last Call Review
Team Security Area Directorate (secdir)
Deadline 2022-11-14
Requested 2022-10-24
Authors Enke Chen , Naiming Shen , Robert Raszuk , Reshad Rahman
I-D last updated 2022-12-04
Completed reviews Yangdoctors Early review of -01 by Martin Björklund (diff)
Rtgdir Last Call review of -09 by Henning Rogge (diff)
Tsvart Last Call review of -11 by Magnus Westerlund (diff)
Genart Last Call review of -10 by Dan Romascanu (diff)
Secdir Last Call review of -11 by Derek Atkins (diff)
Assignment Reviewer Derek Atkins
State Completed Snapshot
Review review-ietf-bfd-unsolicited-11-secdir-lc-atkins-2022-12-04
Posted at https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/secdir/gPXM2WOTUdb6lKa5SyJcZM7Aqlg
Reviewed revision 11 (document currently at 16)
Result Ready
Completed 2022-12-01
review-ietf-bfd-unsolicited-11-secdir-lc-atkins-2022-12-04-00
Hi,

I have reviewed this document as part of the security directorate's
ongoing effort to review all IETF documents being processed by the
IESG.  These comments were written with the intent of improving
security requirements and considerations in IETF drafts.  Comments
not addressed in last call may be included in AD reviews during the
IESG review.  Document editors and WG chairs should treat these
comments just like any other last call comments.

Summary:

* Ready to Publish

Details:

* Is "Meticulous Keyed SHA1" secure, given the known weaknesses of SHA1?

-derek

-- 
       Derek Atkins                 617-623-3745
       derek@ihtfp.com             www.ihtfp.com
       Computer and Internet Security Consultant