Last Call Review of draft-ietf-bmwg-evpntest-07
review-ietf-bmwg-evpntest-07-secdir-lc-sparks-2021-05-22-00
Request | Review of | draft-ietf-bmwg-evpntest |
---|---|---|
Requested revision | No specific revision (document currently at 11) | |
Type | Last Call Review | |
Team | Security Area Directorate (secdir) | |
Deadline | 2021-05-24 | |
Requested | 2021-05-10 | |
Authors | sudhin jacob , Kishore Tiruveedhula | |
I-D last updated | 2021-05-22 | |
Completed reviews |
Rtgdir Last Call review of -08
by Joel M. Halpern
(diff)
Tsvart Last Call review of -07 by Jana Iyengar (diff) Genart Last Call review of -07 by Ines Robles (diff) Secdir Last Call review of -07 by Robert Sparks (diff) |
|
Assignment | Reviewer | Robert Sparks |
State | Completed | |
Request | Last Call review on draft-ietf-bmwg-evpntest by Security Area Directorate Assigned | |
Posted at | https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/secdir/hrpO_sfzAtA04UnBH6zXhA9Ylpc | |
Reviewed revision | 07 (document currently at 11) | |
Result | Has nits | |
Completed | 2021-05-22 |
review-ietf-bmwg-evpntest-07-secdir-lc-sparks-2021-05-22-00
I have reviewed this document as part of the security directorate's ongoing effort to review all IETF documents being processed by the IESG. These comments were written primarily for the benefit of the security area directors. Document editors and WG chairs should treat these comments just like any other last call comments. This document is essentially ready for publication as an Informational RFC, but with nits. Document reviewed: draft-ietf-bmwg-evpntest-07 This document describes a set of lab-environment characterization tests to be performed on isolated networks. The document has basic formatting issues (line and page length) that should be addressed before submission for publication as an RFC. The document does not discuss how the use of any of the mechanisms discussed in RFC7432 (and the RFCs it relies on) for improving the security characteristics of the protocols in use would affect the measurements being made, though it seems to suggest that the lab mimic production configuration. Perhaps that could be stated more clearly.