Last Call Review of draft-ietf-bmwg-ipv6-nd-04
review-ietf-bmwg-ipv6-nd-04-secdir-lc-laurie-2017-01-26-00
Request | Review of | draft-ietf-bmwg-ipv6-nd |
---|---|---|
Requested revision | No specific revision (document currently at 06) | |
Type | Last Call Review | |
Team | Security Area Directorate (secdir) | |
Deadline | 2017-01-23 | |
Requested | 2017-01-09 | |
Authors | William J. Cerveny , Ron Bonica , Reji Thomas | |
I-D last updated | 2017-01-26 | |
Completed reviews |
Opsdir Last Call review of -04
by Jon Mitchell
(diff)
Secdir Last Call review of -04 by Ben Laurie (diff) Genart Last Call review of -04 by Francis Dupont (diff) |
|
Assignment | Reviewer | Ben Laurie |
State | Completed | |
Request | Last Call review on draft-ietf-bmwg-ipv6-nd by Security Area Directorate Assigned | |
Reviewed revision | 04 (document currently at 06) | |
Result | Ready | |
Completed | 2017-01-26 |
review-ietf-bmwg-ipv6-nd-04-secdir-lc-laurie-2017-01-26-00
I have reviewed this document as part of the security directorate's ongoing effort to review all IETF documents being processed by the IESG. These comments were written primarily for the benefit of the security area directors. Document editors and WG chairs should treat these comments just like any other last call comments. Status: ready. Since this I-D is about benchmarking an unmodified device in an isolated network, it seems it doesn't introduce any security considerations of its own.