Telechat Review of draft-ietf-bmwg-mpls-forwarding-meth-
review-ietf-bmwg-mpls-forwarding-meth-secdir-telechat-astrand-2009-08-27-00
Request | Review of | draft-ietf-bmwg-mpls-forwarding-meth |
---|---|---|
Requested revision | No specific revision (document currently at 06) | |
Type | Telechat Review | |
Team | Security Area Directorate (secdir) | |
Deadline | 2009-08-25 | |
Requested | 2009-08-17 | |
Authors | Carlos Pignataro , Aamer Akhter , Rajiv Asati | |
I-D last updated | 2009-08-27 | |
Completed reviews |
Secdir Telechat review of -??
by Love Hornquist Astrand
|
|
Assignment | Reviewer | Love Hornquist Astrand |
State | Completed | |
Request | Telechat review on draft-ietf-bmwg-mpls-forwarding-meth by Security Area Directorate Assigned | |
Completed | 2009-08-27 |
review-ietf-bmwg-mpls-forwarding-meth-secdir-telechat-astrand-2009-08-27-00
Hi, I have reviewed this document as part of the security directorate's ongoing effort to review all IETF documents being processed by the IESG. These comments were written primarily for the benefit of the security area directors. Document editors and WG chairs should treat these comments just like any other last call comments. This document describes benchmarking activities for mpls networks. By documenting that they should happen only on private disconnected network make no security issues, even though the equipment should be configured as in production environments, so it should already be secured. I see no addition security consideration then whats already documented in the draft. Love