Skip to main content

Telechat Review of draft-ietf-bmwg-sdn-controller-benchmark-meth-08
review-ietf-bmwg-sdn-controller-benchmark-meth-08-genart-telechat-bryant-2018-04-16-00

Request Review of draft-ietf-bmwg-sdn-controller-benchmark-meth
Requested revision No specific revision (document currently at 09)
Type Telechat Review
Team General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) (genart)
Deadline 2018-04-17
Requested 2018-02-27
Authors Bhuvaneswaran Vengainathan , Anton Basil , Mark Tassinari , Vishwas Manral , Sarah Banks
Draft last updated 2018-04-16
Completed reviews Rtgdir Last Call review of -07 by Henning Rogge (diff)
Opsdir Last Call review of -07 by Scott O. Bradner (diff)
Genart Last Call review of -07 by Stewart Bryant (diff)
Secdir Last Call review of -07 by Russ Housley (diff)
Genart Telechat review of -08 by Stewart Bryant (diff)
Assignment Reviewer Stewart Bryant
State Completed
Review review-ietf-bmwg-sdn-controller-benchmark-meth-08-genart-telechat-bryant-2018-04-16
Reviewed revision 08 (document currently at 09)
Result Ready with Nits
Completed 2018-04-16
review-ietf-bmwg-sdn-controller-benchmark-meth-08-genart-telechat-bryant-2018-04-16-00
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area
Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed
by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please wait for direction from your
document shepherd or AD before posting a new version of the draft.

For more information, please see the FAQ at

<https://trac.ietf.org/trac/gen/wiki/GenArtfaq>.

Document: draft-ietf-bmwg-sdn-controller-benchmark-meth-08
Reviewer: Stewart Bryant
Review Date: 2018-04-16
IETF LC End Date: 2018-02-02
IESG Telechat date: 2018-04-19

Summary:

This is a well written comprehensive test set for SDN controllers. Two minor
points remain from my previous review that I would draft to the attention of
the responsible AD.

Major issues: None

Minor issues:

I found the large amount of text on Openflow that appears out of the blue in
the appendix somewhat strange since the test suit is controller protocol
agnostic. I understand that this is included by way of illustrative example. It
might be useful to the reader to make a statement to this effect.

Nits/editorial comments:

   The test traffic
   generators TP1 and TP2 SHOULD be connected to the first and the last
   leaf Network Device.

SB> I am sure I know what does first and last mean, but the meaning should be
called out.