Last Call Review of draft-ietf-capport-api-07
review-ietf-capport-api-07-genart-lc-carpenter-2020-05-03-00
| Request | Review of | draft-ietf-capport-api |
|---|---|---|
| Requested rev. | no specific revision (document currently at 07) | |
| Type | Last Call Review | |
| Team | General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) (genart) | |
| Deadline | 2020-05-11 | |
| Requested | 2020-04-27 | |
| Authors | Tommy Pauly, Darshak Thakore | |
| Draft last updated | 2020-05-03 | |
| Completed reviews |
Secdir Last Call review of -07 by Robert Sparks
Genart Last Call review of -07 by Brian Carpenter Opsdir Last Call review of -07 by Linda Dunbar |
|
| Assignment | Reviewer | Brian Carpenter |
| State | Completed | |
| Review | review-ietf-capport-api-07-genart-lc-carpenter-2020-05-03 | |
| Posted at | https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/gen-art/MFozeC0ZtyQY8C-UUOh7z32o3rg | |
| Reviewed rev. | 07 | |
| Review result | Ready with Nits | |
| Review completed: | 2020-05-03 |
Review
review-ietf-capport-api-07-genart-lc-carpenter-2020-05-03
https://www.ietf.org/id/draft-ietf-capport-api-07.html Gen-ART Last Call review of draft-ietf-capport-api-07 I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please treat these comments just like any other last call comments. For more information, please see the FAQ at <http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq>. Document: draft-ietf-capport-api-07.html Reviewer: Brian Carpenter Review Date: 2020-05-04 IETF LC End Date: 2020-05-11 IESG Telechat date: Summary: Ready (almost...) -------- Minor Issue: ------------ > If the client is captive (i.e. captive=true), > it can still be allowed enough access for it to perform server > authentication Section 4.1. What does "can" mean? MAY or perhaps SHOULD? Is this a local policy decision? Nit: ---- > If the client is captive (i.e. captive=true), > it can still be allowed enough access for it to perform server > authentication Section 4.1. Missing parentheses around "Section 4.1"?