Last Call Review of draft-ietf-capport-api-07
review-ietf-capport-api-07-genart-lc-carpenter-2020-05-03-00

Request Review of draft-ietf-capport-api
Requested rev. no specific revision (document currently at 07)
Type Last Call Review
Team General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) (genart)
Deadline 2020-05-11
Requested 2020-04-27
Authors Tommy Pauly, Darshak Thakore
Draft last updated 2020-05-03
Completed reviews Secdir Last Call review of -07 by Robert Sparks
Genart Last Call review of -07 by Brian Carpenter
Opsdir Last Call review of -07 by Linda Dunbar
Assignment Reviewer Brian Carpenter
State Completed
Review review-ietf-capport-api-07-genart-lc-carpenter-2020-05-03
Posted at https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/gen-art/MFozeC0ZtyQY8C-UUOh7z32o3rg
Reviewed rev. 07
Review result Ready with Nits
Review completed: 2020-05-03

Review
review-ietf-capport-api-07-genart-lc-carpenter-2020-05-03

https://www.ietf.org/id/draft-ietf-capport-api-07.html

Gen-ART Last Call review of draft-ietf-capport-api-07

I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area
Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed
by the IESG for the IETF Chair.  Please treat these comments just
like any other last call comments.

For more information, please see the FAQ at
<http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq>.

Document: draft-ietf-capport-api-07.html
Reviewer: Brian Carpenter
Review Date: 2020-05-04
IETF LC End Date: 2020-05-11
IESG Telechat date:  

Summary: Ready (almost...)
--------

Minor Issue:
------------

>      If the client is captive (i.e. captive=true),
>      it can still be allowed enough access for it to perform server
>      authentication Section 4.1.

What does "can" mean? MAY or perhaps SHOULD? Is this a local policy decision?

Nit:
----

>      If the client is captive (i.e. captive=true),
>      it can still be allowed enough access for it to perform server
>      authentication Section 4.1.

Missing parentheses around "Section 4.1"?