Skip to main content

Last Call Review of draft-ietf-capport-api-07
review-ietf-capport-api-07-genart-lc-carpenter-2020-05-03-00

Request Review of draft-ietf-capport-api
Requested revision No specific revision (document currently at 08)
Type Last Call Review
Team General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) (genart)
Deadline 2020-05-11
Requested 2020-04-27
Authors Tommy Pauly , Darshak Thakore
I-D last updated 2020-05-03
Completed reviews Secdir Last Call review of -07 by Robert Sparks (diff)
Genart Last Call review of -07 by Brian E. Carpenter (diff)
Opsdir Last Call review of -07 by Linda Dunbar (diff)
Assignment Reviewer Brian E. Carpenter
State Completed
Request Last Call review on draft-ietf-capport-api by General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) Assigned
Posted at https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/gen-art/MFozeC0ZtyQY8C-UUOh7z32o3rg
Reviewed revision 07 (document currently at 08)
Result Ready w/nits
Completed 2020-05-03
review-ietf-capport-api-07-genart-lc-carpenter-2020-05-03-00
https://www.ietf.org/id/draft-ietf-capport-api-07.html

Gen-ART Last Call review of draft-ietf-capport-api-07

I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area
Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed
by the IESG for the IETF Chair.  Please treat these comments just
like any other last call comments.

For more information, please see the FAQ at
<http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq>.

Document: draft-ietf-capport-api-07.html
Reviewer: Brian Carpenter
Review Date: 2020-05-04
IETF LC End Date: 2020-05-11
IESG Telechat date:  

Summary: Ready (almost...)
--------

Minor Issue:
------------

>      If the client is captive (i.e. captive=true),
>      it can still be allowed enough access for it to perform server
>      authentication Section 4.1.

What does "can" mean? MAY or perhaps SHOULD? Is this a local policy decision?

Nit:
----

>      If the client is captive (i.e. captive=true),
>      it can still be allowed enough access for it to perform server
>      authentication Section 4.1.

Missing parentheses around "Section 4.1"?